Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 48-5-380 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 48 REVENUE AND TAXATION

Section 5. Ad Valorem Taxation of Property, 48-5-1 through 48-5-607.

ARTICLE 7 MISCELLANEOUS LOCAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

48-5-380. Refunds of taxes and license fees by counties and municipalities; time and manner of filing claims and actions for refund; authority to approve or disapprove claims.

  1. As provided in this Code section, each county and municipality shall refund to taxpayers any and all taxes and license fees:
    1. Which are determined to have been erroneously or illegally assessed and collected from the taxpayers under the laws of this state or under the resolutions or ordinances of any county or municipality; or
    2. Which are determined to have been voluntarily or involuntarily overpaid by the taxpayers.
  2. Any taxpayer from whom a tax or license fee was collected who alleges that such tax or license fee was collected illegally or erroneously may file a claim for a refund with the governing authority of the county or municipality at any time within one year or, in the case of taxes, three years after the date of the payment of the tax or license fee to the county or municipality. The claim for refund shall be in writing and shall be in the form and shall contain the information required by the appropriate governing authority. The claim shall include a summary statement of the grounds upon which the taxpayer relies. In the event the taxpayer desires a conference or hearing before the governing authority in connection with any claim for a refund, the taxpayer shall so specify in writing in the claim. If the claim conforms to the requirements of this Code section, the governing authority shall grant a conference at a time specified by the governing authority. The governing authority shall consider information contained in the taxpayer's claim for a refund and such other information as is available. The governing authority shall approve or disapprove the taxpayer's claim and shall notify the taxpayer of its action. In the event any claim for refund is approved, the governing authority shall proceed under subsection (a) of this Code section to give effect to the terms of that subsection. No refund provided for in this Code section shall be assignable. Submitting a request for refund to the governing authority is not a prerequisite to bringing suit.
  3. The filing of a request for a refund with the governing authority under subsection (b) of this Code section shall act to stay the time period for initiating suit for a refund. Following the filing of a request for refund with the governing authority, no suit may be commenced until the earlier of the governing authority's denial of the request for refund or the expiration of 90 days from the date of filing the claim. Alternatively, any taxpayer may forgo requesting a refund from the governing authority under subsection (b) of this Code section and elect to proceed directly to filing suit.
  4. Any refunds approved or allowed under this Code section shall be paid from funds of the county, the municipality, the county board of education, the state, or any other entity to which the taxes or license fees were originally paid. Refunds shall be paid within 60 days of the approval of the taxpayer's claim or within 60 days of the entry of a final decision in any action for a refund.
  5. The governing authority of any county, by resolution, and the governing authority of any municipality, by ordinance, shall adopt rules and regulations governing the administration of this Code section and may delegate the administration of this Code section, including the approval or disapproval of claims where the reason for the claim is based on an obvious clerical error, to an appropriate department in local government. In disputed cases where there is no obvious error, the approval or disapproval of claims may not be delegated by the governing authority.
  6. Nothing contained in subsections (b) or (c) of this Code section shall be deemed the exclusive remedy to seek a refund nor deprive taxpayers of the right to seek a refund mandated by subsection (a) by any other cause of action available at law or equity.
  7. Under no circumstances may a suit for refund be commenced more than five years from the date of the payment of taxes or fees at issue.

(a.1)If property owners have been billed and have remitted property tax payments to either a county or a municipality based on the fair market value of the land and subsequently the fair market value of such land is reduced on an appeal, then the county or the municipality shall reimburse the property owner the difference between tax remitted and the final tax owed for each year in which the incorrect fair market value of the land was used in the calculations.

(Code 1933, §§ 92-3901a, 92-3902a, 92-3903a, 92-3904a, 92-3905a, enacted by Ga. L. 1975, p. 774, § 1; Ga. L. 1978, p. 928, § 1; Code 1933, § 91A-1601, enacted by Ga. L. 1978, p. 309, § 2; Ga. L. 1979, p. 5, § 46; Ga. L. 1980, p. 463, § 2; Ga. L. 2010, p. 1104, § 7-1/SB 346; Ga. L. 2014, p. 672, § 5/HB 755.)

Law reviews.

- For annual survey of state and local taxation, see 38 Mercer L. Rev. 337 (1986). For survey article on real property law, see 67 Mercer L. Rev. 193 (2015). For note as to the voluntary payment doctrine in Georgia, see 16 Ga. L. Rev. 893 (1982).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

City tax against airlines illegal.

- City tax assessments against an airline, based on either the total gross receipts of the business or on the total number of employees, are illegal under 49 U.S.C. § 1513, and the airline is entitled to a refund under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380 for the payments the airline timely claimed. City of College Park v. Atlantic S.E. Airlines, 194 Ga. App. 637, 391 S.E.2d 460 (1990).

Appeal process under

§ 48-5-311 distinguished. - While the appeal process of O.C.G.A. § 48-5-311 is available to address any asserted error in an ad valorem real property tax assessment, the refund process established by O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380 is intended only to correct errors of fact or law which have resulted in erroneous or illegal taxation. Gwinnett County v. Gwinnett I Ltd. Partnership, 265 Ga. 645, 458 S.E.2d 632 (1995).

Standing.

- Because the taxpayer's assignee lacked standing to claim a refund of ad valorem taxes allegedly overpaid by its assignor, the trial court erred in finding that the assignee was entitled to the refund; as a result, the court also erred in denying the respective counties summary judgment on the issue. Clayton County v. HealthSouth Holdings, Inc., 288 Ga. App. 406, 654 S.E.2d 143 (2007).

Amount of assessment not proper matter for basis of refund claim.

- Claim for refund of taxes that was not based on any inaccuracy in the factual record or in any illegality in the procedure used to reach the assessment, but on a disagreement with the amount thereof was not one cognizable as a refund action under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380. Gwinnett County v. Gwinnett I Ltd. Partnership, 265 Ga. 645, 458 S.E.2d 632 (1995); Parian Lodge, Inc. v. DeKalb County, 225 Ga. App. 853, 485 S.E.2d 545 (1997); National Health Network, Inc. v. Fulton County, 228 Ga. App. 584, 492 S.E.2d 333 (1997).

City's occupation tax did not violate commerce clause.

- City's occupation tax did not violate the commerce clause because both interstate sellers and businesses selling exclusively within Georgia were charged the tax based on the number of employees within the city and the gross receipts from sales in Georgia. GMC v. City of Doraville, 284 Ga. 689, 670 S.E.2d 787 (2008).

Taxpayer need not comply with the appeal procedure provided in O.C.G.A. § 48-5-311(e) prior to proceeding under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380. Marconi Avionics, Inc. v. DeKalb County, 165 Ga. App. 628, 302 S.E.2d 384 (1983).

Failure to comply with O.C.G.A. § 48-5-311. - Corporate taxpayers were barred from seeking refunds, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380, of ad valorem taxes paid on vehicles with tax situses in other states because the taxpayers failed to follow the appeal procedures provided by O.C.G.A. § 48-5-311. DeKalb County v. Genuine Parts Co., 225 Ga. App. 376, 484 S.E.2d 57 (1997).

County and the county tax commission were entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law in an action filed by a trucking company seeking a refund for ad valorem taxes the company paid as it was undisputed at trial that the company failed to timely file for either an apportionment in two subject years, as required by Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 560-11-7-.02, and that the company did not appeal the company's ad valorem assessment within 45 days of the assessment in either year, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 48-5-311; furthermore, O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380, which allowed a taxpayer to seek a refund up to three years after paying an erroneous or illegal tax, did not apply. Trans Link Motor Express, Inc. v. Dougherty County, 265 Ga. App. 10, 592 S.E.2d 859 (2003).

When a taxpayer challenged an assessment, but paid the taxes, the taxpayer could not bring an action in the courts for a declaratory judgment to determine the validity of the assessment until the taxpayer exhausted the taxpayer's statutory administrative options under either O.C.G.A. § 48-5-311 or O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380. Wilmington Trust Co. v. Glynn County, 265 Ga. App. 704, 595 S.E.2d 562 (2004).

Exhaustion of administrative remedies.

- In a tax refund class action under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380, the named attorneys satisfied the administrative exhaustion requirement for an entire class of attorneys; the named attorneys acted for the entire class pursuant to former O.C.G.A. § 9-11-23 by giving the City of Atlanta notice of the tax constitutionality claim by filing administrative and civil actions, and permitting recovery only to those attorneys with the foresight to have demanded a refund was untenable in a case such as the instant one that involved a matter of constitutional import and an unconstitutional ordinance that had been relied upon to improperly collect taxes. Barnes v. City of Atlanta, 281 Ga. 256, 637 S.E.2d 4 (2006).

Mandamus appropriate.

- O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380 does not provide a legally adequate remedy to a taxpayer who has been denied the long-term preferential assessment that may be accorded rehabilitated historic property under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-7.2, and thus mandamus is an appropriate remedy. Chatham County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Emmoth, 278 Ga. 144, 598 S.E.2d 495 (2004).

Property owners filed a class action alleging that a county had improperly recalculated property taxes without affording taxpayers the required statutory notice and the opportunity to appeal under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-311. Given the differences between the appeal remedy and the refund remedy provided by O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380 - as well as the possibility that a refund action might not be available to all class members - the trial court properly determined that a refund action was not an adequate remedy and that equitable relief was necessary to protect the class members' right to pursue the legal remedy provided in § 48-5-311. Fulton County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Marani, 299 Ga. App. 580, 683 S.E.2d 136 (2009), cert. denied, No. S09C2072, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 18 (Ga. 2010).

Justification for asserting claim.

- General Assembly did not intend to make a taxpayer's right to assert a claim for a tax refund contingent on a prior decision by the taxing authority or some unspecified appeals tribunal approving a nonexistent claim. Rather, subsection (b) of O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380 clearly authorizes the taxpayer to assert a claim for a refund based on the taxpayer's own determination that such a refund is warranted. Eastern Air Lines v. Fulton County, 183 Ga. App. 891, 360 S.E.2d 425, cert. denied, 183 Ga. App. 906, 360 S.E.2d 425 (1987).

County's inability to produce a property tax card in response to discovery requests did not in itself show a factual inaccuracy in the assessment procedure. National Health Network, Inc. v. Fulton County, 228 Ga. App. 584, 492 S.E.2d 333 (1997).

Zoning issues.

- Taxpayer's contention that the assessors failure to consider zoning conditions in making an assessment raised an error of law for purposes of O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380, even though such conditions were not recorded with the superior court at the time of the assessment. Brian Realty Corp. v. DeKalb County, 229 Ga. App. 209, 493 S.E.2d 595 (1997).

Nontaxability of property proper grounds for seeking refund based on improper assessment.

- There is nothing in the statutory scheme, or in the procedure for appeals from property tax assessments, that precludes consideration of the taxability or nontaxability of property if that forms the basis of the allegation that the property was erroneously or illegally assessed or that there was an overpayment. Marconi Avionics, Inc. v. DeKalb County, 165 Ga. App. 628, 302 S.E.2d 384 (1983).

Valuation, uniformity, and equalization proper matters for basis of refund claim.

- Landowner's right to recover taxes illegally collected over a 13-year period was limited to three years prior to the filing of the landowner's claim, even though the county did not admit that the county was not entitled to the taxes collected until just before the claim was filed, since the landowner had suspected error and could have instituted a claim for refund earlier but failed to do so. Webb v. Coweta County, 178 Ga. App. 170, 342 S.E.2d 345 (1986).

Tax refund statute did not waive school district immunity.

- Taxpayer's suit against a school district seeking a refund was barred by immunity under Ga. Const. 1983, Art. I, Sec, II, Para. IX(e) and Ga. Const. 1983, Art. IX, Sec. II, Para. IX; O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380 provided for tax refunds by counties and municipalities but not school districts and, therefore, did not constitute a waiver of the school district's immunity. City of Dublin Sch. Dist. v. MMT Holdings, LLC, 346 Ga. App. 546, 816 S.E.2d 494 (2018).

Failure to consider factors relevant to fair market value not "erroneous."

- County's alleged failure to consider factors listed in O.C.G.A. § 48-5-2 that are relevant to fair market value does not make the assessed value factually inaccurate and, therefore, erroneous. National Health Network, Inc. v. Fulton County, 270 Ga. 724, 514 S.E.2d 422 (1999).

Neither taxpayer brought a claim for an erroneous or illegal tax assessment under the refund statute since the taxpayers did not allege that the counties did not have authority to impose the tax, committed a clerical error, or collected a wrongly assessed tax; instead, both claims constituted assertions that the assessors, although using correct procedures, did not take into account matters which the taxpayer believed should have been considered in determining the assessed value. National Health Network, Inc. v. Fulton County, 270 Ga. 724, 514 S.E.2d 422 (1999).

Failure to indicate fair market value on return.

- When a taxpayer sold improvements on the taxpayer's property, then filed a return in which the taxpayer left blank the area for "market value," the taxpayer was not entitled to a refund under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380, as under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-6, returns had to state fair market value; a county was not required to interpret the taxpayer's silence on market value as a declaration that there was no value, and under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-20(a)(1), a taxpayer who failed to return taxable property in a given year was deemed to have returned the property at the same valuation as applied the preceding year. Int'l Auto Processing, Inc. v. Glynn County, 287 Ga. App. 431, 651 S.E.2d 535 (2007).

Recovery of overpaid taxes due to miscalculation of homestead exemption.

- Under local legislation, the term "base year" was defined as the taxable year immediately preceding the taxable year in which the homestead exemption was first granted by a county; therefore, the county erred in using the next year to calculate the taxpayers' exemption and the taxpayers could recover under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380. Coleman v. Glynn County, 344 Ga. App. 545, 809 S.E.2d 383 (2018).

Failure to provide notice of damages issue.

- While the trial court did not err in entering an order granting partial summary judgment to a city on the city's breach of contract claim against a county and the county's tax commissioner, ruling that the latter breached their contract to bill, collect, and remit ad valorem taxes on the city's behalf because the county was not given adequate notice that the trial court would address the amount of damages incurred by the city as a result of the county's breach, the grant of summary judgment as to the damages issue was reversed on due process grounds. Ferdinand v. City of East Point, 288 Ga. App. 152, 653 S.E.2d 529 (2007), cert. denied, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 213 (Ga. 2008).

Form for claiming refund.

- Subsection (b) of O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380 quite clearly does not require that a tax refund claim be made "on" a particular form supplied by the taxing authority but merely that the claim be made "in writing" and "in the form and [containing] the information required by" the authority. Eastern Air Lines v. Fulton County, 183 Ga. App. 891, 360 S.E.2d 425, cert. denied, 183 Ga. App. 906, 360 S.E.2d 425 (1987).

Substantial compliance.

- Notice of refund claim filed pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380 was not deficient when the notice clearly stated a summary of grounds upon which the taxpayer relied. There is no requirement that the summary of grounds must be the exact grounds upon which a refund was ultimately authorized; a notice in substantial compliance with § 48-5-380 is sufficient. City of College Park v. Atlantic S.E. Airlines, 194 Ga. App. 637, 391 S.E.2d 460 (1990).

Assignment of interest in refund action.

- Taxpayer's assignment of an interest in a refund action to a consulting firm was not improper because the agreement provided that the firm was to retain a percentage of the amount of the refund the firm obtained for the taxpayer. Brian Realty Corp. v. DeKalb County, 229 Ga. App. 209, 493 S.E.2d 595 (1997).

City's occupation tax used same combination of criteria for all taxpayers.

- Taxpayer claimed a city's occupation tax did not classify different companies by the same "combination of criteria" as required by O.C.G.A. § 48-13-10(a) as some businesses paid taxes based on their gross receipts, while others paid based on the number of their employees. This claim failed as § 48-13-10(a)(1) and (a)(3) provided that an occupation tax could be calculated using both the number of employees and gross receipts, and the occupation tax was calculated in the same manner for every company. GMC v. City of Doraville, 284 Ga. 689, 670 S.E.2d 787 (2008).

No takings claim.

- Taxpayers did not a have a takings claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because the procedures of O.C.G.A. § 48-5-311 or O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380 provide adequate remedies. Brian Realty Corp. v. DeKalb County, 229 Ga. App. 209, 493 S.E.2d 595 (1997).

Action under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 barred. - Statute provides an adequate remedy at law to contest a tax assessment or deficiency notice; therefore, the plaintiff owners of restaurants and bars holding liquor licenses could not maintain an action against the defendant city under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for declaratory and injunctive relief. Atlanta Hospitality Workers, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 247 Ga. App. 650, 545 S.E.2d 49 (2001).

Defenses unavailable in federal government action.

- Neither voluntary payment nor the failure to exhaust state administrative remedies is available as a defense to a federal government action sounded in quasi-contract for the recovery of treasury funds paid by mistake which result in the unjust enrichment of a county. United States v. DeKalb County, 729 F.2d 738 (11th Cir. 1984).

Recovery of prejudgment interest.

- Taxpayer may recover prejudgment interest in an action for a refund of wrongfully collected taxes from the date of the demand for refund, not from the date the taxes were collected. Eastern Air Lines v. Fulton County, 183 Ga. App. 891, 360 S.E.2d 425, cert. denied, 183 Ga. App. 906, 360 S.E.2d 425 (1987).

Taxpayers could only recover overpayments for three years preceding their claim.

- Because O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380(b) limited taxpayer recovery to overpayments made within three years of a written claim for refund, the county's sovereign immunity was waived only for the improper payments made within that three-year window. In a class action, the class members' three-year window was determined as of the date of filing the action. Mandamus and equity were unavailable to circumvent this limitation. Coleman v. Glynn County, 344 Ga. App. 545, 809 S.E.2d 383 (2018).

Cited in Gwinnett Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. City of Buford, 185 Ga. App. 200, 363 S.E.2d 597 (1987).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Construction with § 33-8-8.6. - With respect to certain tax refunds, the requirements of O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380 should be read in conjunction with O.C.G.A. § 33-8-8.6. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 84-24.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 72 Am. Jur. 2d, State and Local Taxation, § 965 et seq.

C.J.S.

- 64A C.J.S., Municipal Corporations, § 2393 et seq. 85 C.J.S., Taxation, § 1049 et seq.

ALR.

- When right to refund of state or local taxes accrues, within statute limiting time for applying for refund, 46 A.L.R.2d 1350.

Recovery of tax paid on exempt property, 25 A.L.R.4th 186.

Validity and applicability of statutory time limit concerning taxpayer's claim for state tax refund, 1 A.L.R.6th 1.

Construction and operation of statutory time limit for filing claim for state tax refund, 14 A.L.R.6th 119.

Effect of delay in receipt or negotiation of refund check in determining right to interest under § 6611 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 USCA § 6611), 145 A.L.R. Fed. 437.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 48-5-380

Total Results: 13  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Gwinnett Cnty. v. Gwinnett I Ltd. P'ship, 458 S.E.2d 632 (Ga. 1995).

Cited 30 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 30, 1995 | 265 Ga. 645

...grounds raised by GILP. Gwinnett I, LTD v. Gwinnett County, 214 Ga.App. 248, 447 S.E.2d 679 (1994). We granted the writ of certiorari to consider whether a taxpayer may raise issues of valuation, uniformity, and equalization in an action under OCGA § 48-5-380 seeking a refund of ad valorem real property taxes....
...An appeal from an assessment is governed by time periods measured in days, and jury trials in such appeals are to be heard at the first term following the filing of the appeal. OCGA § 48-5-311(e)(2)(A) and (g)(4)(A). A refund action, though, may be brought any time within three years of the payment of taxes (OCGA § 48-5-380(b)); that time is extended further by provisions giving the governing authority of the county a year to decide the claim (assuming there are no extensions, which the statute also permits) and giving the taxpayer another year after that de...
...There needs to be, however, some procedure in place to protect taxpayers from later-discovered defects in the assessment process which have resulted in taxes being "erroneously or illegally assessed and collected." The Court of Appeals correctly held in Marconi that § 48-5-380 provides such a procedure....
...Corim, Inc., 262 Ga. 364, 366, 418 S.E.2d 601 (1992). Accordingly, we conclude that while the appeal process of § 48-5-311 is available to address any asserted error in an ad valorem real property tax assessment, the refund process established by § 48-5-380 is intended only to correct errors of fact or law which have resulted in erroneous or illegal taxation....
...If the taxpayer alleges that the assessment is based on matters of fact in the record which are inaccurate, or that the assessment was reached by the use of illegal procedures, then the taxpayer has asserted a claim that the taxes were "erroneously or illegally assessed and collected," which is what § 48-5-380 addresses....
...nto account matters which the taxpayer believes should have been considered (e.g., different comparable sales for the purpose of establishing value), is not, however, one which asserts that an assessment is erroneous or illegal within the meaning of § 48-5-380....
...In discovery responses, GILP failed to set forth any factual basis for its claim, asserting that the amount it paid in a foreclosure sale in 1990 established the fair market value of the property in 1989. That being so, it is apparent from the record that GILP's claim is not one cognizable as a refund action under § 48-5-380 and that the County was entitled to summary judgment....
Copy

Love v. Fulton Cnty. Bd. of Tax Assessors, 859 S.E.2d 33 (Ga. 2021).

Cited 24 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 1, 2021 | 311 Ga. 682

...0-9-10, as amended in 1989, is unconstitutional. The fourth amended petition also added a new claim seeking an order directing Fulton County and the Fulton County Tax Commissioner to issue a refund under 17 OCGA § 48-5-380 to every county resident who was allegedly overcharged for property taxes in 2018 and 2019 based on the Board’s alleged failure to assess taxes against StadCo in connection with its interest in the stadium (Count V).5 On April 22, 20...
...rial court erred in dismissing their claim for a tax refund on the ground that the claim was moot. In the fourth amended petition, the appellants asserted a new claim against Fulton County and the Fulton County Tax Commissioner, pursuant to OCGA § 48-5-380, seeking a refund of taxes that Fulton County taxpayers had allegedly illegally paid to the county....
Copy

City of Atlanta v. Barnes, 578 S.E.2d 110 (Ga. 2003).

Cited 22 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 10, 2003 | 276 Ga. 449, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 796

...h is not a judicial function. McCabe v. Lundell, 199 Ga.App. 639(2), 405 S.E.2d 693 (1991). The trial court did not err in failing to find the unconstitutional portion of the ordinance severable. 3. The suit in this case was brought pursuant to OCGA § 48-5-380(c), which provides in pertinent part as follows: Any taxpayer whose claim for refund is denied by the governing authority of the county or municipality or whose claim is not denied or approved by the governing authority within one year fr...
...lost that use. Weighing those equities, we are not persuaded that justice requires prospective application. 5. Finally, Atlanta complains that the trial court erred in finding that the three-year statute of limitation in the tax refund statute, OCGA § 48-5-380, was tolled as to the Class One plaintiffs, those who had not made a demand for a refund at least one year prior to the filing of the suit....
...ndatory administrative remedy, and that since the Class One plaintiffs had not complied with the statute, they could not be certified as a class for the refund portion of the suit. In a subsequent portion of the order, the trial court held that OCGA § 48-5-380(b) establishes a three-year statute of limitation for refund suits, [2] running from the date of demand, and ruled that since the demand was made in 1999, the refund claim could apply only to taxes paid in 1996 and thereafter....
...n immunity is thereby waived and the extent of such waiver." By contrast, Art. IX, Sec. II, Par. IX provides succinctly as follows: "The General Assembly may waive the immunity of counties, municipalities, and school districts by law." [2] That OCGA § 48-5-380 establishes a three-year period of limitation for tax refund claims was recognized in Nat....
Copy

Barnes v. City of Atlanta, 637 S.E.2d 4 (Ga. 2006).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 16, 2006 | 281 Ga. 256, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 3164

...Linda Katherine DiSantis, City Atty., City of Atlanta Law Department, Lemuel Herbert Ward, Atlanta, for appellee. CARLEY, Justice. In 1999, a group of attorneys (named plaintiffs) who maintain offices and practice law in the City of Atlanta demanded, pursuant to OCGA § 48-5-380, a refund of occupation taxes which had been imposed by the City and paid by them during the previous three years....
...constitutional regulation of the practice of law and seeking a refund of taxes paid. The trial court entered a class certification order that divided the affected attorneys into Class II, the members of which had already demanded a refund under OCGA § 48-5-380, and Class I, whose members had not....
...The trial court subsequently granted summary judgment in the plaintiffs' favor on the constitutional issue. On appeal, we held that the City's occupation tax ordinance was unconstitutional to the extent that it included lawyers, and that a class action for tax refunds pursuant to OCGA § 48-5-380 was appropriate....
...City of Atlanta, 275 Ga.App. 385, 620 S.E.2d 846 (2005) ( Barnes II ). We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision. 1. "A common thread running through the plaintiffs' arguments is that the pre-litigation claim for a refund contemplated by OCGA § 48-5-380 is not applicable to the claims of the Class I taxpayers....
...e statutory requirement for an administrative demand "was inapplicable because their claim was brought as a class action." Barnes II, supra at 388(1)(a), 620 S.E.2d 846. The Court of Appeals concluded that, while a class action could supplement OCGA § 48-5-380 with respect to the claims of Class II, the plaintiffs cannot look to Barnes [I] as authority for employing a class action to circumvent the statutory *6 requirements which had yet to be satisfied by members of Class I. Barnes II, supra at 389(1)(a), 620 S.E.2d 846. In our prior opinion, however, we held that OCGA § 48-5-380 does not "provide for the form of action to be utilized....
...refund claims against the State). Thus, any taxpayer whom the named plaintiffs represent and who does not ultimately opt out of the class action is considered to have brought suit for a refund at the same time as the named plaintiffs. Although OCGA § 48-5-380 is applicable to that suit, so too are those principles which apply generally in class actions, including that which permits a representative to act on behalf of an entire class....
...2 Newberg on Class Actions § 5:15, p. 438 (4th ed.2002). Decisions to the contrary, such as U.S. Xpress v. State of New Mexico, 139 N.M. 589, 136 P.3d 999 (2006), are "based on genuinely unique statutory requirements." 2 Newberg, supra at 440. OCGA § 48-5-380, unlike certain tax refund statutes, neither prohibits utilization of a class action, nor expressly requires individual exhaustion of administrative remedies....
...it erroneously failed to recognize that the filing of the refund claims in the trial court by named plaintiffs who had exhausted their administrative remedies satisfied the exhaustion requirement on behalf of the Class I plaintiffs. Therefore, OCGA § 48-5-380(b) bars the refund claims of the Class I members only for those taxes that were paid more than three years before the date on which the named plaintiffs filed the complaint in this case....
Copy

Nat'l Health Network, Inc. v. Fulton Cnty., 514 S.E.2d 422 (Ga. 1999).

Cited 13 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 15, 1999 | 270 Ga. 724, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 1051

...Groover, Thomas Arthur Cox, Jr., Vernitia Averett Shannon, Atlanta, for Fulton County et al. Thomas L. Hawker, Hunter, MacLean, Exley & Dunn, P.C., Atlanta, for Brian Realty Corporation. FLETCHER, Presiding Justice. The property owners in these cases both filed an action seeking a property tax refund under OCGA § 48-5-380....
...The issue on appeal is whether either property owner has raised a claim of an erroneous or illegal assessment under the tax refund statute. Because the property owners have not established that the counties assessed or collected an erroneous or illegal tax, we conclude that they are not entitled to a refund under OCGA § 48-5-380....
...he Lake Hearn property, that were assembled in the 1980s for commercial development. [1] It did not appeal the assessed value of the property at that time. Later, the realty company filed this action contending that it was entitled to a refund under § 48-5-380 based on the tax assessor's failure to consider that the property had conditions placed on its Office-Institutional zoning....
...Three years later, it filed a refund claim arguing that the tax assessor failed to consider the existing use of the property. The trial court granted summary judgment to the county and the Court of Appeals of Georgia affirmed. [3] The court held that National Health did not meet the requirements for a refund action under § 48-5-380, the assessor's failure to consider existing use did not make the method of assessment incorrect, and the taxpayer had to challenge the assessment in an appeal under § 48-5-311. We granted certiorari in both cases to consider whether the court of appeals correctly construed OCGA § 48-5-380, the tax refund statute....
...This appeal process "is intended to provide the most expeditious resolution of a taxpayer's dissatisfaction with an assessment, preferably before taxes are paid." [7] The second procedure provides for the refund of property taxes that have been erroneously or illegally assessed and collected. Subsection (a) of OCGA § 48-5-380 provides: Each county or municipality may refund to taxpayers any and all taxes and license fees which are determined to have been erroneously or illegally assessed and collected from the taxpayers under the laws of this state or under th...
...[11] Although this Court eventually struck down the tax digests on the grounds that they created different classes of tangible property in violation of the Georgia Constitution, [12] the taxpayers were not always able to recover the illegal taxes they had paid. [13] Thus, the legislature enacted § 48-5-380 to overcome the rule that a taxpayer could not recover a voluntary payment of taxes....
...Although a taxpayer may raise issues of valuation, uniformity, and equalization under both statutes, we explained that the taxpayer should assert any error in the assessment of the real property in an appeal proceeding under § 48-5-311 whereas the refund action under § 48-5-380 is reserved for claims of factual or legal error that have resulted in erroneous or illegal taxation....
...nto account matters which the taxpayer believes should have been considered (e.g., different comparable sales for the purpose of establishing value), is not, however, one which asserts that an assessment is erroneous or illegal within the meaning of § 48-5-380....
Copy

Federated Mut. Ins. Co. v. Dekalb Cnty., 341 S.E.2d 3 (Ga. 1986).

Cited 13 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 18, 1986 | 255 Ga. 522

...d that enabling statute by implication. After Cotton State's victory, Federated Mutual began this action seeking a refund of premium taxes it paid DeKalb County (Federated Mutual acknowledged a three-year limit on refunds for taxes by virtue of OCGA § 48-5-380)....
Copy

Schorr v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 697 S.E.2d 827 (Ga. 2010).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jul 12, 2010 | 287 Ga. 570, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2292

...that pre-suit requirement for all class members. Barnes v. City of Atlanta, 281 Ga. 256, 257(1), 637 S.E.2d 4 (2006) ( Barnes II ). The particular pre-litigation requirement involved in Barnes II was the demand for a tax refund contemplated by OCGA § 48-5-380....
...ssue in Barnes II is a distinction without a difference. Both preconditions for suit are absolute requirements. The City's claim in Barnes II that certain class members failed to exhaust their administrative remedies for tax refunds pursuant to OCGA § 48-5-380 pertained to the unwaivable defense of lack of subject matter jurisdiction....
...pational taxes that the City had unconstitutionally collected from them. Prior to filing the lawsuit, however, some of the class members had exhausted their administrative remedies by filing a claim with the City for a tax refund as required by OCGA § 48-5-380, [2] *831 whereas other class members had not filed the statutorily required pre-lawsuit refund claim with the City. In reversing the Court of Appeals' decision, which held that the class members who had not satisfied the pre-lawsuit refund claim requirement must do so, this Court stated: Although OCGA § 48-5-380 is applicable to [the suit of the class members who have not satisfied the pre-suit refund claim requirement], so too are those principles which apply generally in class actions, including that which permits a representative to act on behalf of an entire class....
...berg on Class Actions § 5:15, p. 438 (4th ed. 2002). Decisions to the contrary, such as U.S. Xpress v. State of New Mexico, 139 N.M. 589, 136 P.3d 999 (N.M.2006), are "based on genuinely unique statutory requirements." 2 Newberg, supra at 440. OCGA § 48-5-380, unlike certain tax refund statutes, neither prohibits utilization of a class action, nor expressly requires individual exhaustion of administrative remedies....
...amed plaintiff on behalf of the putative class members. See Barnes II, supra, 281 Ga. at 258(1), 637 S.E.2d 4. In order to equate the liquidated damages demand requirement of former OCGA § 44-14-3 with the administrative procedure contained in OCGA § 48-5-380(c), the majority must disregard the plain language of OCGA § 44-14-3, which this Court is expressly forbidden from doing....
...tion and punctuation omitted); State v. Fielden, 280 Ga. 444, 448, 629 S.E.2d 252 (2006) ("[U]nder our system of separation of powers this Court does not have the authority to rewrite statutes."). Indeed, unlike the administrative procedures of OCGA § 48-5-380(c) that serve the primary purpose of providing "early notice [to a government entity] of its potential liability" ( Barnes II, supra, 281 Ga....
...ning authority of the county or municipality renders a decision on the claim within the one-year period. No action or proceeding for the recovery of a refund shall be commenced after the expiration of one year from the date the claim is denied. OCGA § 48-5-380(c)....
Copy

Chatham Cnty. Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Emmoth, 598 S.E.2d 495 (Ga. 2004).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 28, 2004 | 278 Ga. 144, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2126

...In light of the Board's failure to provide Emmoth with the proper statutory notice, the Board's reliance upon Chatham County Bd. of Assessors v. Jepson, 261 Ga.App. 771, 584 S.E.2d 22 (2003), is misplaced. We reject the Board's argument that mandamus was not appropriate. OCGA § 48-5-380 does not provide a legally adequate remedy to a taxpayer who has been denied the long-term preferential assessment that may be accorded rehabilitated historic property under OCGA § 48-5-7.2....
Copy

James F. Nelson, Jr. Fam. Ltd. P'ship v. Miller, 479 S.E.2d 737 (Ga. 1997).

Cited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jan 21, 1997 | 267 Ga. 466, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 212

...against the mineral rights interest in the 269.5-acre tract which he never returned and which was never assessed by the tax assessor's office. If Miller has paid erroneously assessed taxes on his homeplace, he can apply for a refund pursuant to OCGA § 48-5-380....
Copy

Jones v. City of Atlanta, 908 S.E.2d 519 (Ga. 2024).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 31, 2024 | 320 Ga. 239

...direct cost and indirect cost to the [G]eneral [F]und.” 5. Appellant’s claims for relief. Based on the allegations and documents described above, Appellant brought 23 claims for relief. His Complaint includes four claims for a tax refund under OCGA § 48-5-380 (Counts 6, 8, 13 and 14); ten claims seeking declarations under OCGA § 9-4-1 et seq....
...Appellant argues that in doing so, the trial court erred by: (1) misapplying the standard of review applicable to motions for judgments on the pleadings, (2) failing to consider certain exhibits to the Complaint, (3) holding that Appellant was not entitled to a tax refund under OCGA § 48-5-380, (4) holding that the Ordinances were lawful exercises of the City’s Supplementary Powers, (5) giving undue deference to the statements of legislative intent found in the Ordinance’s recitals, and (6) holding that the Disputed Char...
...evenue. For the reasons we set out below, we agree that the trial court erred by failing to treat these allegations as true. This error affected not only the court’s analysis of whether Appellant could bring a tax refund action under OCGA § 48-5-380 and of whether the Disputed 15 Charges are taxes or fees, but some or all of Appellant’s other claims as well.9 We accordingly vacate the trial court’s judgment on the pleadings, as expressed in D...
...City of Doraville, 297 Ga. 513, 522 (3) (a) (773 SE2d 728) (2015) (citation and punctuation omitted). B. The trial court erred on review of the City’s motion for judgment on the pleadings by concluding that Appellant did not pay the Disputed Charges. 1. OCGA § 48-5-380 (b) provides in pertinent part that “[a]ny taxpayer from whom a tax ....
...Because Appellant alleged that he paid the Disputed Charges and that allegation was not inconsistent with the exhibits, the trial court was required to treat this allegation as true. It erred by failing to do so and by concluding that Appellant was unable to bring a tax refund claim under OCGA § 48-5-380 for that reason. 3....
Copy

Hollis v. City of Lagrange, 910 S.E.2d 211 (Ga. 2024).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Dec 10, 2024 | 320 Ga. 451

... asserted, because it was not expressly authorized by the Georgia Constitution or by law, as required by Article IX, Section IV, Paragraph I of the Georgia Constitution of 1983.2 The plaintiffs sought “a refund of the illegal taxes” under OCGA § 48-5-3803 with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest; a declaration that the utilities charges that were in excess of the actual cost of providing utilities services and that were used to generate general revenue for the City constituted “...
...at 146-147. 2 That provision says, in pertinent part: “Except as otherwise provided in this Paragraph, the governing authority of any county, municipality, or combination thereof may exercise the power of taxation as authorized by this Constitution or by general law.” 3 OCGA § 48-5-380 says, in pertinent part: (a) As provided in this Code section, each county and municipality shall refund to taxpayers any and all taxes and license fees: (1) Which are determined to have been erroneously or...
Copy

Vesta Holdings, LLC v. Freeman, 632 S.E.2d 87 (Ga. 2006).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 12, 2006 | 280 Ga. 608, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1830

...voidable can only be determined through judicial proceedings, instituted by parties in interest, and not by the sheriff himself). [4] Gladden, 73 Ga. at 238, 6 S.E. 161. [5] Singer Sewing Machine Co., 76 Ga. at 378. [6] See, e.g., OCGA §§ 48-5-311 (providing taxpayers an avenue to appeal county tax assessments); 48-5-380 (providing for taxpayer refunds for assessments determined to be erroneous)....
Copy

Gen. Motors Corp. v. City of Doraville, 670 S.E.2d 787 (Ga. 2008).

Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 25, 2008 | 284 Ga. 689, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3863

...ts occupation taxes for those years. However, GM paid these taxes under protest, and filed refund claims with Doraville for 2001, 2002, and 2003. After GM received no response from Doraville regarding its refund claims, GM filed an action under OCGA § 48-5-380 [2] in DeKalb County Superior Court, seeking a refund of the occupation taxes it paid to Doraville for the tax years 2001, 2002, and 2003....