O.C.G.A.
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
IN THE
STATE OF GEORGIA A.B., Plaintiff v. C.D., Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil action File no. (Clerk will insert number.)
COMPLAINT The defendant C.D., herein named, is a resident of (street), (city), County, Georgia, and is subject to the jurisdiction of this court. On or about December 1, 1966, defendant converted to his own use ten bonds of the Company (here insert brief identification as by number and issue) of the value of $10,000.00, the property of plaintiff. Wherefore, plaintiff demands judgment against defendant in the sum of $10,000.00, interest, and costs. Attorney for plaintiff Address
History
(Ga. L. 1966, p. 609, § 111; Ga. L. 1980, p. 649, § 9; Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, § 9.)
Annotations
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Am. v. Baum, 629 F. Supp. 466 (N.D. Ga. 1986).
Cited in Charles S. Martin Distrib. Co. v. Indon Indus. Inc., 134 Ga. App. 179, 213 S.E.2d 900 (1975); Prudential Ins. Co. of
RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 61A Am. Jur. 2d, Pleading, § 31 et seq. Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms. - 7A Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Conversion, § 2.
C.J.S. - 71 C.J.S., Pleading, § 43 et seq.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 1986–2001 · leading case:
Anderson v. Flake, 480 S.E.2d 10 (Ga. 1997).
Anderson v. Flake, 480 S.E.2d 10 (Ga. 1997).
· cites it 2× “9 OCGA §§ 9-11-111 and 9-6-60 et seq. 10 See Whaley v.”
Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Baum, 629 F. Supp. 466 (N.D. Ga. 1986).
· cites it 2× “O.C.G.A. § 9-11-111 (Supp.1985) suggests that a pleading need only state that the defendant “converted to his own use” the property in issue.”
Universal Underwriters Ins. v. Albert, 546 S.E.2d 361 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 2× “See OCGA §§ 9-11-111 (providing a form complaint for conversion which establishes that a complaint need only state that the “defendant converted to his own use”); 9-11-84 (providing that form is sufficient under the Georgia Civil Practice Act); see also Prudential Ins.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.