Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1894, p. 123, §§ 10, 11; Civil Code 1895, §§ 4590, 4591, 4592; Civil Code 1910, §§ 5136, 5137, 5138; Code 1933, §§ 10-302, 10-303, 10-304.)
- Exceptions to an auditor's report, as to any matter not appearing upon the face of the record or brief of evidence or in the report itself, must be verified by the auditor as true. If a report affords no means of verification, the exception cannot be considered. Patterson v. Burtz, 39 Ga. App. 139, 146 S.E. 330 (1929); Robinson v. Reese, 175 Ga. 574, 165 S.E. 744 (1932).
Exceptions of law must be based on grounds verified by auditor's report or the auditor's certificate. Waycross Air-Line R.R. v. Offerman & W.R.R., 119 Ga. 983, 47 S.E. 582 (1904).
- Exceptions to an auditor's report claiming error in rulings on the admission of evidence cannot be considered where it did not appear on the face of the record or brief of evidence or in the report itself what the evidence was, what the objection was, and what the ruling was, and where recitals in exceptions not certified by the auditor to be true were insufficient. Eatonton Oil & Auto Co. v. Greene County, 53 Ga. App. 145, 185 S.E. 296 (1936); Bussell v. Glenn, 197 Ga. 816, 30 S.E.2d 617 (1944).
Cited in Smith v. Smith, 135 Ga. 582, 69 S.E. 1110 (1911); Patterson v. Burtz, 39 Ga. App. 139, 146 S.E. 330 (1929); Loftis v. Hubbard, 42 Ga. App. 829, 157 S.E. 704 (1931).
- 52 Am. Jur. 2d, Mandamus, §§ 69, 112 et seq., 155 et seq., 168 et seq., 232, 325.
- 55 C.J.S., Mandamus, §§ 69, 145, 173, 207, 266.
No results found for Georgia Code 9-7-15.