Solicitation to halt or impede lawful forest, mining or agricultural practices.
Any person who solicits any other person, or conspires with any other person to commit any crime against property or person with the specific intent to halt, impede, obstruct or interfere with the lawful management, cultivation or harvesting of trees or timber or with the lawful management or operations of agricultural or mining industries, if the act is performed to effect the object of the solicitation or conspiracy, shall be guilty of a felony; provided however, that any person who solicits any other person or conspires with any other person to stage a peaceful demonstration which is not designed, planned, or intended to involve the commission of any crime against property or person shall not be guilty of any crime under the provision of this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases (
5 in the last 5 years), 2023–2025 · leading case:
State v. Ingraham, 528 P.3d 966 (Idaho 2023).
State v. Ingraham, 528 P.3d 966 (Idaho 2023).
· cites it 2× “Section 18-2005(6) makes it clear that once a person is found guilty of DUI or pleads guilty to a DUI it is sufficient grounds to enhance a future charge regardless of what type of leniency or relief may have been granted following the conviction.”
State v. Ingraham, 528 P.3d 966 (Idaho 2023).
· cites it 2× “Section 18-2005(6) makes it clear that once a person is found guilty of DUI or pleads guilty to a DUI it is sufficient grounds to enhance a future charge regardless of what type of leniency or relief may have been granted following the conviction.”
State v. Crombie (Idaho Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 2× “Like the enhancing language in I.C. § 18-2005(6), the DUI enhancing statute, I.”
State v. Ingraham, 528 P.3d 966 (Idaho 2023).
· cites it 2× “Section 18-2005(6) makes it clear that once a person is found guilty of DUI or pleads guilty to a DUI it is sufficient grounds to enhance a future charge regardless of what type of leniency or relief may have been granted following the conviction.”
State v. Crombie (Idaho Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 2× “Like the enhancing language in I.C. § 18-2005(6), the DUI enhancing statute, I.”
Idaho Code § 18-2005(6): 5 cases
State v. Ingraham, 528 P.3d 966 (Idaho 2023).
“Section 18-2005(6) makes it clear that once a person is found guilty of DUI or pleads guilty to a DUI it is sufficient grounds to enhance a future charge regardless of what type of leniency or relief may have been granted following the conviction.”
State v. Ingraham, 528 P.3d 966 (Idaho 2023).
“Section 18-2005(6) makes it clear that once a person is found guilty of DUI or pleads guilty to a DUI it is sufficient grounds to enhance a future charge regardless of what type of leniency or relief may have been granted following the conviction.”
State v. Crombie (Idaho Ct. App. 2025).
“Like the enhancing language in I.C. § 18-2005(6), the DUI enhancing statute, I.”
State v. Ingraham, 528 P.3d 966 (Idaho 2023).
“Section 18-2005(6) makes it clear that once a person is found guilty of DUI or pleads guilty to a DUI it is sufficient grounds to enhance a future charge regardless of what type of leniency or relief may have been granted following the conviction.”
State v. Crombie (Idaho Ct. App. 2025).
“Like the enhancing language in I.C. § 18-2005(6), the DUI enhancing statute, I.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.