Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 18-4012 (2026)
Excusable homicide.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Excusable homicide.
Homicide is excusable in the following cases:
1. When committed by accident and misfortune in doing any lawful act by lawful means, with usual and ordinary caution, and without any unlawful intent.
2. When committed by accident and misfortune, in the heat of passion, upon any sudden and sufficient provocation, or upon a sudden combat when no undue advantage is taken nor any dangerous weapon used, and when the killing is not done in a cruel or unusual manner.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1954–2025 · leading case: State v. Anderson, 352 P.2d 972 (Idaho 1960).
State v. Anderson, 352 P.2d 972 (Idaho 1960). “29 [2] , relating to excusable homicide, his main objection being that after quoting from I.C. § 18-4012, the trial court followed the quotation with the requirement, inter alia, that "the defendant prove that he was using usual and ordinary caution.”
State v. Robert Dean Hall, 387 P.3d 81 (Idaho 2016). “The defense also argued in the memorandum that an excusable homicide instruction should be given as defined in Idaho Code section 18-4012 based upon anticipated evidence showing that the shooting was accidental.”
State v. Pennell, 701 P.2d 289 (Idaho Ct. App. 1985). “Pennell requested the trial court give an instruction to the jury, informing the jury of the provisions of I.C. § 18-4012. That statute provides: Homicide is excusable in the following cases: 1.”
State v. Betts, 514 P.3d 341 (Kan. 2022). “§ 703-310 (2) (self-defense justification unavailable "for such recklessness or negligence toward innocent persons"); Idaho Code Ann. § 18-4012 ("Homicide is excusable .”
State v. Long, 423 P.2d 858 (Idaho 1967). “§ 18-4006 is void for uncertainty or indefiniteness, consideration must also be given to other provisions which bear upon the issue, including I.C. § 18-4012, I.C. § 18-114, and I.C. § 18-101, subp.”
State v. Tiffany, 88 P.3d 728 (Idaho 2004). “This instruction is based upon Idaho Code § 18-4012 . Tiffany argues that this instruction was supported by testimony from others that she would never have purposefully injured Nathan and her extrajudicial statements that she placed her hand over his nose and mouth to quiet him.”
State v. McNair, 108 P.3d 410 (Idaho Ct. App. 2005). “When committed by accident and misfortune in doing any lawful act by lawful means, with usual and ordinary caution, and without any unlawful intent.”
Haxforth v. State, 786 P.2d 580 (Idaho Ct. App. 1990). “2d 858, 865 (1967) our Supreme Court determined that the reference to “culpable negligence” is simply a reiteration of the excusable homicide standard under I.C. § 18-4012. It does not preclude imposition of criminal responsibility for negligence under the vehicular manslaughter…”
State v. Koho, 423 P.2d 1004 (Idaho 1967). “” These definitions were necessary to distinguish murder from manslaughter.”
State v. Cox, 351 P.2d 472 (Idaho 1960). “25 “You are instructed that under Section 18-4012 of the Idaho Code which I have just read to you, a homicide cannot be held to be excusable unless the following four conditions are present: First, the homicide must have been committed by accident and misfortune; Second, it must…”
State v. Deane, 268 P.2d 1114 (Idaho 1954). “The requested instruction was incomplete in that it did not embody therein, nor did any other requested instruction, the substance of Section 19-2112, Idaho Code: "Upon a trial for murder the commission of the homicide by the defendant being proved, the burden of proving…”
State v. Robert Dean Hall (Idaho 2016). “The defense also argued in the memorandum that an excusable homicide instruction should be given as defined in Idaho Code section 18-4012 based upon anticipated evidence showing that the shooting was accidental.”
— Idaho Code § 18-4012(1) — 1 case
State v. Pennell, 701 P.2d 289 (Idaho Ct. App. 1985). “Pennell requested the trial court give an instruction to the jury, informing the jury of the provisions of I.C. § 18-4012. That statute provides: Homicide is excusable in the following cases: 1.”
— Idaho Code § 18-4012(2) — 1 case
State v. Pennell, 701 P.2d 289 (Idaho Ct. App. 1985). “Pennell requested the trial court give an instruction to the jury, informing the jury of the provisions of I.C. § 18-4012. That statute provides: Homicide is excusable in the following cases: 1.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.