Arrest prior to requisition.
(1) Except in cases arising under section 19-4506, Idaho Code, a judge or magistrate shall issue a warrant directed to any peace officer commanding him to apprehend the person named therein, wherever he may be found in this state, and to bring him before the same or any other judge or magistrate which may be available in or of convenient access to the place where the arrest may be made, to answer to the charge or complaint and affidavit:
(a) Whenever any person within this state is charged on the oath of any credible person before any judge or magistrate of this state with the commission of any crime in any other state and has fled from justice, or has been convicted of a crime in that state and has escaped from confinement, or has broken the terms of his bail, probation or parole; or
(b) Whenever complaint is made before any judge or magistrate in this state setting forth on the affidavit of any credible person in another state that a crime has been committed in such other state and that the accused has been charged in such state with the commission of the crime and has fled from justice, or has been convicted of a crime in that state and has escaped from confinement, or has broken the terms of his bail, probation or parole and is believed to be in this state.
(2) A certified copy of the sworn charge or complaint and affidavit upon which the warrant is issued shall be attached to the warrant.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases, 1953–2010 · leading case:
State v. Bradley, 679 P.2d 635 (Idaho 1983).
State v. Bradley, 679 P.2d 635 (Idaho 1983).
· cites it 8× “I.C. § 19-4513 enacted at the same time as I.”
Struve v. Wilcox, 579 P.2d 1188 (Idaho 1978).
· cites it 2× “Struve, in the complaint that has been filed with the Court in this case, you are charged with being a fugitive from justice in the State of South Dakota, in violation of Idaho Code 19-4513. At this time, I will read the complaint to you.”
Elder v. Holloway, 874 F. Supp. 278 (D. Idaho 1995).
· cites it 2× “It was only after the surveillance was discovered by Elder’s brother that the decision was made to contact Elder by phone within the home.”
Ex Parte Olsen, 263 P.2d 388 (Idaho 1953).
“§ 19-4513, I.C. Warrants were issued upon these complaints and the petitioner was arrested, and'placed in the county jail in custody of the sheriff, subject to bail.”
United States v. Robert Brewster, 387 F. App'x 763 (9th Cir. 2010).
“The district court did not err by denying Brewster’s motion to suppress because police officers in Idaho arrested him on the basis of a warrant for a California state parole violation and did not obtain a warrant in Idaho, as required by Idaho Code § 19-4513 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.