Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 19-4904 (2026)
Inability to pay costs.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Inability to pay costs.
If the applicant is unable to pay court costs and expenses of representation, including stenographic, printing, witness fees and expenses, and legal services, these costs and expenses, and a court-appointed attorney may be made available to the applicant in the preparation of the application, in the trial court, and on appeal, and paid, on order of the district court, by the county in which the application is filed.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 127
cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: Murphy v. State, 139 P.3d 741 (Idaho Ct. App. 2006).
Murphy v. State, 139 P.3d 741 (Idaho Ct. App. 2006). “In order to make the required showing of prejudice, Murphy requested funding pursuant to I.C. § 19-4904 to retain an independent forensic pathologist to review the autopsy reports, gunshot residue report, and Dr.”
Follinus v. State, 908 P.2d 590 (Idaho Ct. App. 1995). “Follinus claims that he has a right to competent counsel pursuant to Idaho Code Section 19-4904. Idaho appellate courts have found that Idaho Code Section 19-4904 created a statutory right to counsel in post-conviction proceedings prior to its amendment in 1993.”
Gonzales v. State, 254 P.3d 69 (Idaho Ct. App. 2011). “The district court denied Gonzales's request, concluding that Gonzales's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel were frivolous and that Gonzales had failed to set forth any facts showing the possibility of a valid claim in his application, his response to the district…”
Woodrow Grant v. State, 329 P.3d 380 (Idaho Ct. App. 2014). “Discretionary Appointment of Post-Conviction Counsel Grant also argues the district court erred in refusing to appoint post-conviction counsel because he met the requirement of demonstrating a potentially valid claim under I.C. § 19-4904. The state argues Grant failed to raise…”
Alisha Ann Murphy v. State, 327 P.3d 365 (Idaho 2014). “Murphy’s successive post-conviction petition asserted that her post-conviction counsel was ineffective for a number of reasons and sought the appointment of counsel to pursue her petition’s claims.”
Brown v. State, 23 P.3d 138 (Idaho 2001). “It issued a decision holding that the appointment of counsel in post-conviction proceedings is governed by two statutes, Idaho Code §§ 19-4904 and 19-852; that when those two statutes are read together, counsel must be appointed unless all the claims alleged in the petition for…”
Charboneau v. State, 102 P.3d 1108 (Idaho 2004). “A request for appointment of counsel in a post conviction proceeding is governed by Idaho Code § 19-4904 , which provides that in proceedings under the UPCPA, a court-appointed attorney "may be made available" to an applicant who is unable to pay the costs of representation The…”
Newman v. State, 95 P.3d 642 (Idaho Ct. App. 2004). “I.C. § 19-4904. In Brown v. State, 135 Idaho 676 , 23 P.”
Phillips v. State, 700 P.2d 27 (Idaho 1985). “First, the trial court determined that Phillips did not comply with I.C. § 19-4904 which requires a showing of indigency before the court will provide counsel and assistance.”
Banks v. State, 920 P.2d 905 (Idaho 1996). “I.C. § 19-4904 (Supp.1995) (emphasis added).”
Swader v. State, 152 P.3d 12 (Idaho 2007). “§ 19-853, was amended to make clear that appointment of counsel at public expense in post-conviction cases shall be in accordance with I.C. § 19-4904. Thus, I.C. § 19-852 no longer applies in post-conviction cases and appointment of counsel in those cases is governed only by I.”
Quinlan v. Idaho Comm'n for Pardons & Parole, 69 P.3d 146 (Idaho 2003). “In Brown , a post-conviction case, this Court found the appointment of counsel in post-conviction cases to be governed by both I.C. §§ 19-4904 and 19-852. After Brown , I.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.