Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 20-237 (2026)

Transmission of convicted persons to penitentiary or custody of board — Notice of conviction to director — Transported by guards — Time for notice. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Transmission of convicted persons to penitentiary or custody of board — Notice of conviction to director — Transported by guards — Time for notice. 

When any person is convicted in any court of the state and sentenced to imprisonment and committed to the custody of the state board of correction, or sentenced to suffer the death penalty, the sheriff of the county in which such conviction shall have been had shall immediately, upon passing of sentence, notify the director that a person is in his custody. Such notice shall be transmitted by either telegraph or telephone, followed by a written confirmation by certified mail. As soon as possible upon receipt of such notice, the director shall dispatch one or more correctional officers, as may be necessary, from the department to the place where the convicted person is detained, to secure and convey said convicted person to any department of correction facility, or other facility within the state designated by the state board of correction. The convicted person, a certified copy of the judgment, a copy of the presentence investigation report, if any, a copy of any disciplinary reports filed against the convicted person while in the sheriff’s custody and all of the additional documents and allowable personal property, including medications as set forth in section 20-243, Idaho Code, shall be delivered into the custody of the director or his representative at the time of or prior to the delivery of the convicted person to the department. If all such records, documents, and property are not delivered at that time, the director or his representative may refuse to accept or transport the convicted person to a department facility.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1991–2012 · leading case: Killeen v. Vernon, 822 P.2d 991 (Idaho 1991).
Killeen v. Vernon, 822 P.2d 991 (Idaho 1991). · cites it 22× “In an effort to alleviate some of this overcrowding, on March 8, 1990, Ada County Sheriff Vaughn Killeen filed a verified petition for a writ of mandate and a complaint for declaratory judgment, based on I.C. § 20-237, to compel the Director of the Department of Correction,…”
State v. Moore, 244 P.3d 161 (Idaho 2010). · cites it 4× “Idaho Code § 20-237 requires that “a copy of the presentenee investigation report, if any, .”
State v. Jay R. Marsh, 283 P.3d 107 (Idaho Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “I.C. § 20-237. The certificate of authenticity which the IDOC records department attached to the penitentiary packet stated that the signatories had compared the copies included in Marsh’s penitentiary packet to the original documents which were in the IDOC’s possession.”
State v. Daniel Francis Lute (Idaho Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 4× “In compliance with Idaho Code § 20-237 , a copy of the PSI was forwarded to the IDOC.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.