Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 32-703 (2026)
Default and uncorroborated statements.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Default and uncorroborated statements.
A divorce may be granted upon the default of the defendant, upon the uncorroborated statement, admission or testimony of the plaintiff.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1935–1990 · leading case: Willis v. Willis, 460 P.2d 396 (Idaho 1969).
Willis v. Willis, 460 P.2d 396 (Idaho 1969). “At the trial respondent testified extensively as to his domicile and actions in Idaho and such domicile was regularly corroborated by an independent witness in compliance with the provisions of I.C. § 32-703. Appellant did not testify nor offer any evidence in opposition to this…”
Leonard v. Leonard, 401 P.2d 541 (Idaho 1965). “Under I.C. § 32-703 the courts of this state are required to demand proof of the facts alleged before a valid decree of divorce may be granted.”
Jordan v. Jordan, 275 P.2d 669 (Idaho 1954). “Appellant urges that respondent failed to establish by corroborated evidence that hé Vas a resident of the State of Idaho as allegedly required by Section 32-703, I.C., which reads as follows: “A divorce may be granted upon the default of the defendant, upon the uncorroborated…”
Ellis v. Ellis, 797 P.2d 868 (Idaho Ct. App. 1990). “I.C. § 32-703 (1982). This statute was amended in 1983 by deleting the corroboration requirement.”
Copenhaver v. Common Sch. Dist. No. 17, 52 P.2d 129 (Idaho 1935). “, section 32-703, provides that the board of trustees shall have power, when the annual meeting neglects or refuses to levy a special tax, to levy such special tax: “The board of trustees of common school districts shall have power when the annual meeting neglects or refuses to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.