Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 34-2101 (2026)
short title — intent.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
short title — intent.
(1) This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Election Contests Act."
(2) The purpose of this act is to simplify and clarify the laws governing election contests of legislative seats and election contests for all officers of the executive department.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1967–2012 · leading case: Noble v. Ada Cnty. Elections Bd., 20 P.3d 679 (Idaho 2000).
Noble v. Ada Cnty. Elections Bd., 20 P.3d 679 (Idaho 2000). “Granting Noble’s Rule 15(b) motion meant nothing more than that the parties had tried the issues of illegal votes pursuant to I.”
Jim Brannon v. City of Coeur D'Alene, Idaho, 292 P.3d 234 (Idaho 2012). “However, the evidence offered in support at trial alleges neither fraud nor malconduct, but instead addresses alleged misinterpretations of the law, failure to follow election law to the letter, and errors in counting the absentee ballots.”
Jordan v. Pearce, 429 P.2d 419 (Idaho 1967). “§ 34-2001(2), § 34-2101(2). Appellant concedes that each respondent has met the express statutory requirements for eligibility to run for office, such as “age, citizenship, residency, sanity, morality, and freedom from criminal activities,” but she contends that each of them was…”
Idaho Code § 34-2101(1): 2 cases
Noble v. Ada Cnty. Elections Bd., 20 P.3d 679 (Idaho 2000). “Granting Noble’s Rule 15(b) motion meant nothing more than that the parties had tried the issues of illegal votes pursuant to I.”
Jim Brannon v. City of Coeur D'Alene, Idaho, 292 P.3d 234 (Idaho 2012). “However, the evidence offered in support at trial alleges neither fraud nor malconduct, but instead addresses alleged misinterpretations of the law, failure to follow election law to the letter, and errors in counting the absentee ballots.”
Idaho Code § 34-2101(2): 1 case
Jordan v. Pearce, 429 P.2d 419 (Idaho 1967). “§ 34-2001(2), § 34-2101(2). Appellant concedes that each respondent has met the express statutory requirements for eligibility to run for office, such as “age, citizenship, residency, sanity, morality, and freedom from criminal activities,” but she contends that each of them was…”
Idaho Code § 34-2101(5): 2 cases
Noble v. Ada Cnty. Elections Bd., 20 P.3d 679 (Idaho 2000). “Granting Noble’s Rule 15(b) motion meant nothing more than that the parties had tried the issues of illegal votes pursuant to I.”
Jim Brannon v. City of Coeur D'Alene, Idaho, 292 P.3d 234 (Idaho 2012). “However, the evidence offered in support at trial alleges neither fraud nor malconduct, but instead addresses alleged misinterpretations of the law, failure to follow election law to the letter, and errors in counting the absentee ballots.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.