Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 42-1405 (2026)
General adjudication — Public interest.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
General adjudication — Public interest.
(1) Five (5) or more or a majority of the users of water from any water system may petition the director to request the attorney general to file an action to commence a general adjudication. If the director deems that the public interest and necessity will be served by a determination of the water rights of that water system, the director shall request the attorney general to file an action to commence the general adjudication.
(2) If the director deems that the public interest and necessity will be served by a determination of the water rights of any water system, the director, upon his own initiative, may request the attorney general to file an action to commence a general adjudication.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1975–1990 · leading case: Nettleton v. Higginson, 558 P.2d 1048 (Idaho 1977).
Nettleton v. Higginson, 558 P.2d 1048 (Idaho 1977). “Our holding is supported by a comparison of the state's duty as mandated by Article 15, § 1 of the Idaho Constitution with the appellant's ability, under I.C. § 42-1405, [3] to at any time *1053 verify his "constitutional use right," thereby reaping the protective benefit of I.”
Silverstein v. Carlson, 797 P.2d 856 (Idaho 1990). “Pursuant to I.C. § 42-1405 (1990), the director of the Idaho Department of Water Resources (the director) conducted an examination of the water rights claimed by Silverstein.”
Parke v. Bell, 539 P.2d 995 (Idaho 1975). “This ease is not one involving a summary supplemental adjudication of water rights under I.C. § 42-1405, but was started as a controversy between two parties only.”
— Idaho Code § 42-1405(f) — 1 case
Silverstein v. Carlson, 797 P.2d 856 (Idaho 1990). “Pursuant to I.C. § 42-1405 (1990), the director of the Idaho Department of Water Resources (the director) conducted an examination of the water rights claimed by Silverstein.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.