Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 43-902 (2026)

Construction work — Additional items. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Construction work — Additional items. 

The term construction work as herein used, shall be deemed to include the erection of pump houses and electrical and other pumps or appliances for raising water onto the lands, as well as dams, headgates, ditches, laterals and other irrigation works. There may be included in any contract for construction, maintenance, interest and power charges for such period as the directors and the contractor may agree, not to exceed three (3) years, and when so included, interest, electrical, or other power and maintenance charges for the term agreed upon may be paid in bonds of the district to the amount agreed upon.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1940–2005 · leading case: Lebak v. Nelson, 107 P.2d 1054 (Idaho 1940).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lebak v. Nelson, 107 P.2d 1054 (Idaho 1940). · cites it 3× “The legislature, by section 43-902, supra, states the reasons which moved it to enact the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and its purpose.”
Roe v. Albertson's, Inc., 112 P.3d 812 (Idaho 2005). · cites it 2× “Idaho Code § 72-201 provides: The common law system governing the remedy of workmen against employers for injuries received and occupational diseases contracted in industrial and public work is inconsistent with modern industrial conditions.”
Skelly v. Sunshine Mining Co., 109 P.2d 622 (Idaho 1941). · cites it 4× “’ ’ Section 43-902, I. C. A., declares that all phases of the premises (Workmen’s Compensation) “are withdrawn from private controversy, and sure and certain relief for injured workmen and their families and dependents is hereby provided regardless of fault and to the exclusion…”
Indus. Indem. Co. v. Columbia Basin Steel & Iron Inc., 471 P.2d 574 (Idaho 1970). · cites it 2× “Contrary to the contentions of Garff, the statute did not abolish all common law causes of action between the actual employer (subcontractor) and the statutory employer (general contractor) of an injured workman.”
Hancock v. Halliday, 150 P.2d 137 (Idaho 1943). “” The pertinent sections of our statute are Sections 43-902 1 , 43-1003 2 , 43-1004 3 , 43-1005 4 , 43-1107 5 , 43-1108 6 , 43-1109 7 , Section 43-1413, I.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.