labeling.
On and after September 1, 2019, manufacturers or distributors of electric bicycles shall apply a label that is permanently affixed, in a prominent location, to each electric bicycle. The label shall contain the classification number, top assisted speed, and motor wattage of the electric bicycle, and shall be printed in arial font in at least 9-point type.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
10
cases, 1960–1974 · leading case:
Nagel v. Hammond, 408 P.2d 468 (Idaho 1965).
Nagel v. Hammond, 408 P.2d 468 (Idaho 1965).
· cites it 6× “17 is quoted from I.C. § 49-727 and is stated in plain and unambiguous language which laymen are readily able to comprehend.”
Dawson v. Olson, 507 P.2d 804 (Idaho 1973).
· cites it 6× “I.C. § 49-727 governed intersection right of way in Idaho at the time of this accident.”
Holland v. Peterson, 518 P.2d 1190 (Idaho 1974).
· cites it 4× “” Appellant also contends that the trial court incorrectly instructed the jury as to the provisions of I.C. § 49-727. 1 *731 However, the trial court gave to the jury verbatim the provisions of that section as amended in 1969 by the legislature.”
Coughran v. Hickox, 348 P.2d 724 (Idaho 1960).
· cites it 4× “1, which is the same as our I.C. § 49-727, the court said: “ * * * As we view the two sentences, the second one so modifies the first as to require the driver on the left, even though he may reach the intersection first, to yield the right of way to the driver on the right in a…”
Loosli v. Bollinger, 413 P.2d 684 (Idaho 1966).
· cites it 4× “§ 49-727 (a) : “Tlie driver of a vehicle approaching an intersection shall yield the right of way to a vehicle which has entered the intersection from a different highway.”
Drury v. Palmer, 375 P.2d 125 (Idaho 1962).
· cites it 2× “The instruction was given immediately following the instruction quoting portions of I.C. § 49-727, defining the duty of drivers approaching an intersection.”
Haakonstad v. Hoff, 486 P.2d 1013 (Idaho 1971).
· cites it 4× “The district judge found that Hoff had failed to yield the right of way as required by I.C. § 49-727(b), 1 but nevertheless held that Hoff was excused due to the “extreme icy conditions of the road.”
Sanders v. Hamilton, 419 P.2d 667 (Idaho 1966).
· cites it 4× “Requested instruction 4 quoted the provisions of subparagraphs (a) and (b) of I.C. § 49-727, pertaining to the rights of way of vehicles approaching an unmarked intersection.”
Kidd v. Gardner Associated, Inc., 447 P.2d 414 (Idaho 1968).
· cites it 6× “The court gave to the jury the applicable subparagraphs (a) and (b) of I.C. § 49-727, the latter giving the right of way to the driver on the right.”
Idaho Code § 49-727(a): 1 case
Loosli v. Bollinger, 413 P.2d 684 (Idaho 1966).
“§ 49-727 (a) : “Tlie driver of a vehicle approaching an intersection shall yield the right of way to a vehicle which has entered the intersection from a different highway.”
Idaho Code § 49-727(b): 2 cases
Haakonstad v. Hoff, 486 P.2d 1013 (Idaho 1971).
“The district judge found that Hoff had failed to yield the right of way as required by I.C. § 49-727(b), 1 but nevertheless held that Hoff was excused due to the “extreme icy conditions of the road.”
Kidd v. Gardner Associated, Inc., 447 P.2d 414 (Idaho 1968).
“The court gave to the jury the applicable subparagraphs (a) and (b) of I.C. § 49-727, the latter giving the right of way to the driver on the right.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.