Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 54-1806 (2026)

Powers and duties. 

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Powers and duties. 

The board shall have the authority to:

(1)  Establish rules, subject to legislative approval, for administration of this chapter.
(2)  Review investigations and examinations as authorized by this section and by section 54-1806A, Idaho Code.
(3)  Operate, manage, superintend and control the licensure of physicians and physician assistants.
(4)  Perform such other duties as set forth in the laws of this state.
(5)  Provide such other services and perform such other functions as are necessary to fulfill its responsibilities.
(6)  Share with the department of labor personal identifying information of persons licensed under the provisions of this chapter necessary for the department of labor to identify workforce shortage areas in Idaho. The information provided to the department of labor concerning any person licensed under this chapter shall remain confidential and not subject to public disclosure, as required in section 74-106, Idaho Code.
(7)(a)  Collect and review data and information concerning maternal mortality in the state of Idaho. The board shall have the power throughout the state of Idaho to require the production of all information relating to any incidence of maternal mortality.
(b)  The board shall provide an annual summary report no later than January 31 each year to the legislature on the number of instances of maternal mortality and other information as determined by the board.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2002–2016 · leading case: Pearl v. BPD of Idaho State Bd. of Med., 44 P.3d 1162 (Idaho 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pearl v. BPD of Idaho State Bd. of Med., 44 P.3d 1162 (Idaho 2002). · cites it 12× “Pearl appealed the Board’s decision to the district court, arguing that she was entitled to a hearing before a panel of licensed physicians rather than to a hearing officer, and that the record did not support the Board’s conclusions.”
Suits v. Idaho Bd. of Prof'l Discipline, 64 P.3d 323 (Idaho 2003). · cites it 2× “The Legislature’s revision in 2000 of I.C. §§ 54-1806 and -1806A dissolved the "Board of Professional Discipline” and created in its place a "Committee on Professional Discipline.”
Haw v. Idaho State Bd. of Med., 90 P.3d 902 (Idaho 2004). · cites it 2× “Indeed, Idaho Code § 54-1806 , which sets forth the powers and duties of the Board, provides that if someone disobeys a subpoena issued by the Board, or refuses to testify, the Board can apply to the district court, and the distinct court shall compel compliance by proceedings…”
Robert Mena v. State Bd. of Med., 368 P.3d 999 (Idaho 2016). · cites it 12× “In the same legislation, the legislature provided that a person who was the recipient of services that constituted the unlawful practice of medicine could recover against the provider of such services “[Reasonable attorney fees and court costs.”
Olsen v. Idaho State Bd. of Med., 363 F.3d 916 (9th Cir. 2004). “Idaho Code §§ 54-1806 & 54-1806A. In this case, the underlying disciplinary dispute involved whether, under applicable Idaho regulations, Olsen was entitled to have her license reinstated after its automatic cancellation after her overdose in 1996.”
Idaho Code § 54-1806(1): 1 case
Pearl v. BPD of Idaho State Bd. of Med., 44 P.3d 1162 (Idaho 2002). “Pearl appealed the Board’s decision to the district court, arguing that she was entitled to a hearing before a panel of licensed physicians rather than to a hearing officer, and that the record did not support the Board’s conclusions.”
Idaho Code § 54-1806(11): 1 case
Robert Mena v. State Bd. of Med., 368 P.3d 999 (Idaho 2016). “In the same legislation, the legislature provided that a person who was the recipient of services that constituted the unlawful practice of medicine could recover against the provider of such services “[Reasonable attorney fees and court costs.”
Idaho Code § 54-1806(2): 1 case
Pearl v. BPD of Idaho State Bd. of Med., 44 P.3d 1162 (Idaho 2002). “Pearl appealed the Board’s decision to the district court, arguing that she was entitled to a hearing before a panel of licensed physicians rather than to a hearing officer, and that the record did not support the Board’s conclusions.”
Idaho Code § 54-1806(4): 1 case
Pearl v. BPD of Idaho State Bd. of Med., 44 P.3d 1162 (Idaho 2002). “Pearl appealed the Board’s decision to the district court, arguing that she was entitled to a hearing before a panel of licensed physicians rather than to a hearing officer, and that the record did not support the Board’s conclusions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.