Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 54-1806 (2026)

Powers and duties. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Powers and duties. 

The board shall have the authority to:

(1)  Establish, pursuant to the administrative procedure act, rules for administration of this chapter, including rules establishing procedures for the receipt of complaints and for the investigation and disposition thereof. Such rules shall provide for notice to a person when board staff has undertaken to investigate that person and shall provide an opportunity for a person under investigation to meet with the committee or board staff before the initiation of formal disciplinary proceedings by the board.
(2)  Conduct investigations and examinations and hold hearings as authorized by this section and by section 54-1806A, Idaho Code.
(3)  The board shall have the power in any investigation or disciplinary proceeding pursuant to this chapter to administer oaths, take depositions of witnesses within or without the state in the manner consistent with rules adopted by the board pursuant to the administrative procedure act and, upon a determination that there is good cause, the board shall have power throughout the state of Idaho to require the attendance of such witnesses and the production of such books, records, and papers as it may deem appropriate for any investigation, deposition or hearing. For that purpose, the board may issue a subpoena for any witnesses, or a subpoena duces tecum to compel the production of any books, records, or papers, directed to the sheriff of any county of the state of Idaho where such witness resides or may be found, which subpoena shall be served and returned in the same manner as a subpoena in a criminal case is served and returned. The fees and mileage of the witnesses shall be the same as that allowed in the district courts in criminal cases, which fees and mileage shall be paid from any funds in the state treasury in the same manner as other expenses of the board are paid. In any case of disobedience to, or neglect of, any subpoena or subpoena duces tecum served upon any person, or the refusal of any witness to testify to any matter regarding which he may lawfully be interrogated, it shall be the duty of the district court of any county in this state in which such disobedience, neglect or refusal occurs, or any judge thereof, on application by the board to compel compliance with the subpoena by proceedings for contempt as in the case of disobedience of the requirements of a subpoena issued from such court or for refusal to testify therein. The licensed person accused in such formal contested case shall have the same right of subpoena upon making application to the board therefor.
(4)  Seek injunctive relief prohibiting the unlawful practice of medicine.
(5)  Make and enter into contracts.
(6)  Operate, manage, superintend and control the licensure of physicians and physician assistants.
(7)  Develop and submit a proposed budget setting forth the amount necessary to perform its functions.
(8)  Perform such other duties as set forth in the laws of this state.
(9)  Provide such other services and perform such other functions as are necessary to fulfill its responsibilities.
(10) Apply the provisions of section 12-117(5), Idaho Code, regarding the assessment of costs and fees incurred in the investigation and prosecution or defense of a licensee under this chapter.
(11) Share with the department of labor personal identifying information of persons licensed under the provisions of this chapter necessary for the department of labor to identify workforce shortage areas in Idaho. The information provided to the department of labor concerning any person licensed under this chapter shall remain confidential and not subject to public disclosure, as required in section 74-106, Idaho Code.
(12)(a)  Collect and review data and information concerning maternal mortality in the state of Idaho. The board shall have the power throughout the state of Idaho to require the production of all information relating to any incidence of maternal mortality.
(b)  The board shall provide an annual summary report no later than January 31 each year to the legislature on the number of instances of maternal mortality and other information as determined by the board.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2002–2016 · leading case: Pearl v. Bpd of Idaho State Bd. of Med., 44 P.3d 1162 (Idaho 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pearl v. Bpd of Idaho State Bd. of Med., 44 P.3d 1162 (Idaho 2002). · cites it 12× “Pearl appealed the Board’s decision to the district court, arguing that she was entitled to a hearing before a panel of licensed physicians rather than to a hearing officer, and that the record did not support the Board’s conclusions.”
Suits v. Idaho Bd. of Prof'l Discipline, 64 P.3d 323 (Idaho 2003). · cites it 2× “The Legislature’s revision in 2000 of I.C. §§ 54-1806 and -1806A dissolved the "Board of Professional Discipline” and created in its place a "Committee on Professional Discipline.”
Haw v. Idaho State Bd. of Med., 90 P.3d 902 (Idaho 2004). · cites it 2× “Indeed, Idaho Code § 54-1806 , which sets forth the powers and duties of the Board, provides that if someone disobeys a subpoena issued by the Board, or refuses to testify, the Board can apply to the district court, and the distinct court shall compel compliance by proceedings…”
Robert Mena, M.D. v. State Bd. of Med., 368 P.3d 999 (Idaho 2016). · cites it 12× “In the same legislation, the legislature provided that a person who was the recipient of services that constituted the unlawful practice of medicine could recover against the provider of such services “[Reasonable attorney fees and court costs.”
Olsen v. Idaho State Bd. of Med., 363 F.3d 916 (9th Cir. 2004). “Idaho Code §§ 54-1806 & 54-1806A. In this case, the underlying disciplinary dispute involved whether, under applicable Idaho regulations, Olsen was entitled to have her license reinstated after its automatic cancellation after her overdose in 1996.”
— Idaho Code § 54-1806(1) — 1 case
Pearl v. Bpd of Idaho State Bd. of Med., 44 P.3d 1162 (Idaho 2002). “Pearl appealed the Board’s decision to the district court, arguing that she was entitled to a hearing before a panel of licensed physicians rather than to a hearing officer, and that the record did not support the Board’s conclusions.”
— Idaho Code § 54-1806(11) — 1 case
Robert Mena, M.D. v. State Bd. of Med., 368 P.3d 999 (Idaho 2016). “In the same legislation, the legislature provided that a person who was the recipient of services that constituted the unlawful practice of medicine could recover against the provider of such services “[Reasonable attorney fees and court costs.”
— Idaho Code § 54-1806(2) — 1 case
Pearl v. Bpd of Idaho State Bd. of Med., 44 P.3d 1162 (Idaho 2002). “Pearl appealed the Board’s decision to the district court, arguing that she was entitled to a hearing before a panel of licensed physicians rather than to a hearing officer, and that the record did not support the Board’s conclusions.”
— Idaho Code § 54-1806(4) — 1 case
Pearl v. Bpd of Idaho State Bd. of Med., 44 P.3d 1162 (Idaho 2002). “Pearl appealed the Board’s decision to the district court, arguing that she was entitled to a hearing before a panel of licensed physicians rather than to a hearing officer, and that the record did not support the Board’s conclusions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.