Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 55-2501 (2026)

Short title. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Short title. 

This chapter may be cited as the "Idaho Property Condition Disclosure Act."

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2002–2024 · leading case: Robert Humphries v. Eileen Becker, 366 P.3d 1088 (Idaho 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Robert Humphries v. Eileen Becker, 366 P.3d 1088 (Idaho 2016). · cites it 4× “llen Becker (“Allen”), and daughter-in-law, Jane Becker (“Jane” and collectively, “Respondents”) of: (1) fraud though misrepresenting, concealing, and/or failing to disclose material information with regards to (a) the sources of water to the Property and (b) the Property’s…”
Partout v. Harper, 183 P.3d 771 (Idaho 2008). · cites it 6× “2 Harper argues Partout only alleged a breach of contract claim based on I.C. § 55-2501 et seq. which deals with a seller’s disclosure form, and therefore, does not apply to Harper.”
Lindberg v. Roseth, 46 P.3d 518 (Idaho 2002). · cites it 2× “The Roseths argue the Idaho Code itself absolves them from any liability as the Idaho Property Condition Disclosure Act (“IPC-DA”) (I.C. § 55-2501 et. seq.) expressly releases a transferor from liability where an independent inspection is made and delivered to the transferee…”
Joseph Bolognese v. Paul Forte, 292 P.3d 248 (Idaho 2012). · cites it 2× “In connection with the sale, Sellers completed and delivered to Buyers a property disclosure form as required by the Idaho Property Condition Disclosure Act, I.C. §§ 55-2501 to 55-2518. When completing that form, Sellers answered “No” to the question, “Have any substantial…”
White v. Mock, 104 P.3d 356 (Idaho 2004). · cites it 2× “The district court ruled in its memorandum decision and order on summary judgment that White was not entitled to the equitable remedy of rescission on his asserted claims of a violation of the Idaho Property Disclosure Act, I.C. § 55-2501 et seq., and fraud. The district court…”
Severinsen v. Tueller, 559 P.3d 771 (Idaho 2024). · cites it 3× “The only argument Severinsen raises in his opening 5 brief regarding the Property Disclosure Act (I.C. § 55-2501, et seq.) is limited to one citation to the Act—a passing reference to the district court “completely disregarding the provisions of I.”
James v. MERCEA, 277 P.3d 361 (Idaho 2012). · cites it 2× “The form signed by the Mereeas in this case included the following: “ADDITIONAL REMARKS AND/OR EXPLANATIONS SECTION: Please list any other existing problems that you know of concerning the property including legal, physical, product defects or others that are not already listed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.