Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 55-909 (2026)

Title of purchaser not impaired.

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Title of purchaser not impaired.

The provisions of this chapter do not in any manner affect or impair the title of a purchaser for a valuable consideration, unless it appears that such purchaser had previous notice of the fraudulent intent of his immediate grantor, or of the fraud rendering void the title of such grantor.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1972–2007 · leading case: W. Idaho Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Simplot Feed Lots, Inc., 678 P.2d 52 (Idaho 1984).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

W. Idaho Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Simplot Feed Lots, Inc., 678 P.2d 52 (Idaho 1984). · cites it 2× “See also I.C. § 55-909, which indicates that the provisions of that chapter dealing with fraudulent transfers do not impair the title of a purchaser for a valuable consideration unless the purchaser had previous notice of the fraud.”

Jahnke v. Mesa Equip., Inc., 916 P.2d 1287 (Idaho Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “See I.C. § 55-909 (Unless a purchaser had previous notice of the fraudulent intent of his immediate grantor or of the fraud rendering void the title of such grant- or, the title of a purchaser for valuable consideration is not affected or impaired.”

Est. of Collins v. Geist, 153 P.3d 1167 (Idaho 2007). · cites it 4× “” With respect to the claimed violation of Idaho Code ' § 55-906, the district court granted summary judgment against Appellants based upon Idaho Code § 55-909 , which provides: The provisions of this chapter do not in any manner affect or impair the title of a purchaser for a…”

Mohar v. McLelland Lumber Co., 501 P.2d 722 (Idaho 1972). “§ 55-906 provides: “Every transfer of property, or charge thereon made, *41 every obligation incurred, and every judicial proceeding taken, with intent to delay or defraud any creditor or other person of his demands, is void against all creditors of the debtor and their…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.