Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 67-511 (2026)
Effect of amendment.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Effect of amendment.
Where a section or part of a statute is amended, it is not to be considered as having been repealed and reenacted in the amended form; but the portions which are not altered are to be considered as having been the law from the time when they were enacted and the new provisions are to be considered as having been enacted at the time of the amendment.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1955–1991 · leading case: Fox v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 827 P.2d 699 (Idaho Ct. App. 1991).
Fox v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 827 P.2d 699 (Idaho Ct. App. 1991). “5 Citing the provisions of I.C. § 67-511, the Commissioners argue that the effective date of an amendment to an existing statute is the date of enactment, rather than the date prescribed by I.”
Emp. Sec. Agency v. Jt. Class \A\" Sch. Dist. No. 151", 400 P.2d 377 (Idaho 1965). “§ 72-1316B, to exclude from covered employment, “all other employees of public school districts”, in addition to the 1961 exclusion of “members of the faculties”.”
State Ex Rel. Nielson v. McCarty, 279 P.2d 879 (Idaho 1955). “The rule of construction applicable is as follows: Where a section or part of a statute is amended, it is not to be considered as having been repealed and reenacted in the amended form; but the portions which are not altered are to be considered as having been the law from the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.