Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 67-5301 (2026)
Establishment of division of human resources and declaration of policy.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Establishment of division of human resources and declaration of policy.
There is hereby established the division of human resources in the office of the governor, which is authorized and directed to administer a personnel system, including the provision of personal and professional training, for state of Idaho employees as set forth in this chapter. The purpose of said personnel system is to provide a means whereby classified employees of the state of Idaho shall be examined, selected, retained and promoted on the basis of merit and their performance of duties, thus effecting economy and efficiency in the administration of state government. The legislature declares that, in its considered judgment, the public good and the general welfare of the citizens of this state require enactment of this measure, under the powers of the state.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1977–2015 · leading case: Idaho State Ins. Fund v. Hunnicutt, 715 P.2d 927 (Idaho 1986).
Idaho State Ins. Fund v. Hunnicutt, 715 P.2d 927 (Idaho 1986). “I.C. § 67-5301. His discharge could only be grounded on certain enumerated causes.”
Lockhart v. Dep't of Fish & Game, 828 P.2d 1299 (Idaho 1992). “In the present case, the Department of Fish and Game does not dispute that the district court has general subject matter jurisdiction by virtue of the Personnel System Act contained in I.C. §§ 67-5301 through 67-5341. The Department argues that the district court is without…”
Swisher v. State Dep't of Env't & Cmty. Servs., 569 P.2d 910 (Idaho 1977). “, the statutes creating the State Personnel Commission and establishing the procedure for classified state employees’ challenge of their discharge, demotion or suspension. As we shall explain in the last part of the opinion, this act establishes the procedures to be followed by…”
Serv. Employees Int'l Union v. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare, 683 P.2d 404 (Idaho 1984). “" We agree, and hold that the motions to dismiss and the motion for summary judgment were properly granted in that appellant should have taken this matter up through the appeal procedure set out in the Idaho Personnel Commission Act, I.C. §§ 67-5301 et seq., which provides that…”
Stroud v. Dep't of Labor & Indus. Servs., 736 P.2d 1345 (Idaho Ct. App. 1987). “The Department contends that the language refers only to certain other rights and benefits *1346 enumerated in the Personnel System Act, I.C. §§ 67-5301 to 67-5339. Stroud was employed in Boise, and Roeckner was employed in Pocatello.”
Hansen v. White, 762 P.2d 820 (Idaho 1988). “Idaho Code § 67-5301 reads: Establishment of personnel commission and declaration of policy.”
Pounds v. Denison, 766 P.2d 1262 (Idaho Ct. App. 1988). “(I.C. § 67-5301 to -5339.) Instead, Pounds filed this lawsuit on February 22,1986.”
Soong v. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare, 968 P.2d 261 (Idaho Ct. App. 1998). “Soong asserts that the Personnel System Act, I.C. §§ 67-5301 to -5342, (the Act) employs essentially a “let ‘em play” philosophy.”
Starr v. Idaho Transp. Dep't, 795 P.2d 21 (Idaho Ct. App. 1990). “Idaho Code § 67-5301 et seq., creates the Idaho Personnel Commission and establishes the procedure for a classified state employee to challenge his or her dismissal.”
Clark v. State, Dept. of Health & Welfare, 5 P.3d 988 (Idaho 2000). “The district court ruled that appellants were probationary employees, subject to the "terms and conditions of public employment with the state of Idaho [as] set forth in the *993 Personnel System Act, Idaho Code § 67-5301 through 67-5342." Thus, even if the district court's…”
Stacey v. Idaho Dep't of Labor, 9 P.3d 530 (Idaho 2000). “The Personnel Commission determined that it had no jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from a hearing officer’s proceeding because the Personnel System Act, I.C. § 67-5301, et seq., (PSA) does not provide for interlocutory appeals.”
Clark v. State, Dep't of Health & Welfare, 5 P.2d 988 (Idaho 2000). “The district court ruled that appellants were probationary employees, subject to the “terms and conditions of public employment with the state of Idaho [as] set forth in the *532 Personnel System Act, Idaho Code § 67-5301 through 67-5342.” Thus, even if the district court’s…”
— Idaho Code § 67-5301(19)(b)(i) — 1 case
Barry Searcy v. State Bd of Corr. (Idaho Ct. App. 2015).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.