Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 67-6525 (2026)
Plan and zoning ordinance changes upon annexation of unincorporated area.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Plan and zoning ordinance changes upon annexation of unincorporated area.
Prior to annexation of an unincorporated area, a city council shall request and receive a recommendation from the planning and zoning commission, or the planning commission and the zoning commission, on the proposed plan and zoning ordinance changes for the unincorporated area. Each commission and the city council shall follow the notice and hearing procedures provided in section 67-6509, Idaho Code. Concurrently or immediately following the adoption of an ordinance of annexation, the city council shall amend the plan and zoning ordinance.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1981–2015 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Roark v. City of Hailey, 633 P.2d 576 (Idaho 1981).
State Ex Rel. Roark v. City of Hailey, 633 P.2d 576 (Idaho 1981). “Finally, the relator contends that the city council failed to amend the plan concurrently or immediately after passage of the annexation ordinance as required by I.C. § 67-6525. However, that requirement must necessarily be premised on the assumption that the annexation…”
Highlands Dev. Corp. v. City of Boise, 188 P.3d 900 (Idaho 2008). “The only statute in LLUPA mentioning annexation is Idaho Code § 67-6525 . It provides, "Concurrently or immediately following the adoption of an ordinance of annexation, the city council shall amend the plan and zoning ordinance.”
Burt v. City of Idaho Falls, 665 P.2d 1075 (Idaho 1983). “Applying the test adopted in Cooper , we hold that in the annexation of land, the subsequent amendment of the comprehensive plan and the zoning of the annexed land, I.C. § 67-6525, the city council acted in a legislative manner, see Cooper, supra ; Dawson, supra ; Harrell, supra…”
Steele v. City of Shelley, 255 P.3d 1175 (Idaho 2011). “Each commission and the city council shall follow the notice and hearing procedures provided in section 67-6509, Idaho Code.”
North Idaho Bldg. Contractors Ass'n v. City of Hayden, 343 P.3d 1086 (Idaho 2015). “I.C. § 67-6525(b). Thus, the additional fee was not to provide sewer service to a house connected to the City sewer system after June 6, 2007, but to accumulate a fund to provide a sewer system to extend to areas to be acquired by the City in the future in order to serve the…”
City of Lewiston v. Bergamo, 804 P.2d 1352 (Idaho Ct. App. 1990). “In reliance on the language of I.C. § 67-6525, the City followed the notice and hearing requirements set forth in I.”
Weyyakin Ranch Prop. Owners' Ass'n v. City of Ketchum, 896 P.2d 327 (Idaho 1995). “The complaint alleged a violation of I.C. § 67-6525.”
Coeur D'Alene Indus. Park Prop. Owners Ass'n v. City of Coeur D'Alene, 702 P.2d 881 (Idaho Ct. App. 1985). “” I.C. § 67-6525. Petitioners concede that this procedural requirement has been satisfied in the present case.”
— Idaho Code § 67-6525(b) — 1 case
North Idaho Bldg. Contractors Ass'n v. City of Hayden, 343 P.3d 1086 (Idaho 2015). “I.C. § 67-6525(b). Thus, the additional fee was not to provide sewer service to a house connected to the City sewer system after June 6, 2007, but to accumulate a fund to provide a sewer system to extend to areas to be acquired by the City in the future in order to serve the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.