Declaration of purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to establish an orderly, consistent review process that better enables state agencies and local governments to evaluate whether proposed regulatory or administrative actions may result in a taking of private property without due process of law. It is not the purpose of this chapter to expand or reduce the scope of private property protections provided in the state and federal constitutions.
Notes of Decisions
N. Idaho Bldg. Contractors Ass'n v. City of Hayden, 432 P.3d 976 (Idaho 2018).
· cites it 2× “I.C. § 67-8001. In Alpine Village Co. v. City of McCall , this Court considered whether plaintiff's federal takings claims for real property were barred based on failure to seek compensation through available state remedies.”
Am. Civil Liberties Union, Idaho Chapter v. Echohawk, 857 P.2d 626 (Idaho 1993).
· cites it 4× “The Attorney General was directed to provide short and long titles for the following proposed law (the "ICA initiative"): PROPOSED TITLE 67, CHAPTER 80, IDAHO CODE Section 67-8001: PURPOSE OF ACT. The provision[s] of Title 67, Chapter 80 of the Idaho Code are enacted by the…”
No ID Bldg Cont Assoc v. City of Hayden (Idaho 2018).
· cites it 2× “I.C. § 67-8001. In Alpine Village Co. v. City of McCall, this Court considered whether plaintiff’s federal takings claims for real property were barred based on failure to seek compensation through available state remedies.”
State v. Jared D. Bristol (Idaho Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 2× “5 Bristol also attempts to make a regulatory taking argument pursuant to the Idaho Regulatory Takings Act, I.C. §§ 67-8001 to 67-8004. However, the Act only applies to a regulatory taking, which is defined as “a regulatory or administrative action resulting in deprivation of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.