Employers’ report of employees.
Requirement to keep records and to report. Subject to the provisions of this law, every employer shall keep an accurate record of the number and job classification of his employees and the wages paid, and upon demand of the commission shall furnish the commission a sworn statement of the same. Such records shall not be open to inspection except on request of the commission. The commission shall have the right, at any time and as often as it requires, to verify the number of employees and the amount of the payroll, and to inspect or cause to be inspected such records.
Information received from employers shall be subject to disclosure as provided in chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code.
Notes of Decisions
MATTER OF LOCKARD v. St. Maries Lumber Co., 274 P.2d 995 (Idaho 1954).
· cites it 4× “This precise situation early (1913) came before the Massachusetts Court and on a statute, 1 as to the precise point involved herein, identical in thought with our statute, Section 72-603, I.C., 2 and a statute, 1911 Mass.”
Shell v. Stand. Oil Co., 461 P.2d 265 (Idaho 1969).
· cites it 4× “I.C. §§ 72-603, 72-604, 72-613. The cases cited by the appellant are all cases in which the board has been sustained in the excerise of one or more of these powers.”
Howard v. FMC Corp., 567 P.2d 10 (Idaho 1977).
· cites it 2× “I.C. §§ 72-603, 72-604, 72-613. The cases cited by the appellant are all cases in which the board has been sustained in the exercise of one or more of these powers.”
Coronado v. City of Boise (Idaho 2025).
· cites it 4× “§ 72-603 (1954) (“If the compensation is not settled by agreement, the board may, upon its own motion, or upon the application of any party to the proceedings, hear the matter or assign it for hearing by a member of the board.”), with I.”
Coronado v. City of Boise (Idaho 2025).
· cites it 4× “§ 72-603 (1954) (“If the compensation is not settled by agreement, the board may, upon its own motion, or upon the application of any party to the proceedings, hear the matter or assign it for hearing by a member of the board.”), with I.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.