Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 73-402 (2026)

Free exercise of religion protected. 

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Free exercise of religion protected. 

(1) Free exercise of religion is a fundamental right that applies in this state, even if laws, rules or other government actions are facially neutral.

(2)  Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, government shall not substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability.
(3)  Government may substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion only if it demonstrates that application of the burden to the person is both:
(a)  Essential to further a compelling governmental interest;
(b)  The least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.
(4)  A person whose religious exercise is burdened in violation of this section may assert that violation as a claim or defense in a judicial proceeding and obtain appropriate relief against a government. A party who prevails in any action to enforce this chapter against a government shall recover attorney’s fees and costs.
(5)  In this section, the term "substantially burden" is intended solely to ensure that this chapter is not triggered by trivial, technical or de minimis infractions.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2003–2025 · leading case: Lewis v. State, Dept. of Transp., 146 P.3d 684 (Idaho Ct. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lewis v. State, Dept. of Transp., 146 P.3d 684 (Idaho Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 24× “See I.C. § 73-402. Idaho Code Section 73-402 provides: (1) Free exercise of religion is a fundamental right that applies in this state, even if laws, rules or other government actions are facially neutral.”
Hyde v. Fisher, 152 P.3d 653 (Idaho Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 12× “Idaho Code Section 73-402 of the FERPA states, in full: (1) Free exercise of religion is a fundamental right that applies in this state, even if laws, rules or other government actions are facially neutral.”
Does v. Lawrence Wasden, 982 F.3d 784 (9th Cir. 2020). · cites it 2× “FERPA’s substantial burden prong is governed by the “religious motivation test,” the broadest of three possible tests, requiring only “that the government prevented the claimant from engaging in conduct both important to them and motivated by sincere religious belief.” Id. at…”
Roles v. Townsend, 64 P.3d 338 (Idaho Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “I.C. § 73-402. We conclude, based on the record before us, that the state has demonstrated beyond any genuine dispute that it has such compelling interests in eliminating tobacco in prisons, that the tobacco-free policy is essential to those interests, and that the policy is the…”
Ricks v. State of Idaho Contractors Bd., 435 P.3d 1 (Idaho Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 6× “(3) Government may substantially burden a person's exercise of religion only if it demonstrates that application of the burden to the person is both: (a) Essential to further a compelling governmental interest; (b) The least restrictive means of furthering that compelling…”
State v. Heath, 485 P.3d 1121 (Idaho 2021). · cites it 2× “” I.C. § 73-402. However, the State argues that Heath waived his argument under FERPA because he did not raise it below.”
Olsen v. Idaho State Bd. of Med., 363 F.3d 916 (9th Cir. 2004). “” Idaho Code § 73-402 (2). The district court dismissed this state law claim, holding that section 73-401 did not apply retroactively to the conduct alleged in Olsen’s complaint because the Act has no language indicating that the Idaho Legislature intended that it was to be…”
Ricks v. State of Idaho Contractors Bd., No. 45396 (Idaho Ct. App. Dec. 3, 2018). · cites it 6× “(3) Government may substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion only if it demonstrates that application of the burden to the person is both: (a) Essential to further a compelling governmental interest; (b) The least restrictive means of furthering that compelling…”
State v. Heath, No. 47334 (Idaho May 20, 2021). · cites it 2× “” I.C. § 73-402. However, the State argues that Heath waived his argument under FERPA because he did not raise it below.”
Pizzuto v. Tewalt, No. 1:21-cv-00267 (D. Idaho June 4, 2024). · cites it 2× “, Idaho’s Free Exercise of Religion Protected Act (FERPA), Idaho Code § 73-402 , and, pursuant to 42 U.”
Andrew Wolf v. Idaho State Bd. of Corr., No. 23-35285 (9th Cir. Oct. 20, 2025). “§ 2000cc-1, and Idaho Free Exercise of Religion Protected Act (FERPA), Idaho Code § 73-402 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.”
Idaho Code § 73-402(1): 1 case
Hyde v. Fisher, 152 P.3d 653 (Idaho Ct. App. 2007). “Idaho Code Section 73-402 of the FERPA states, in full: (1) Free exercise of religion is a fundamental right that applies in this state, even if laws, rules or other government actions are facially neutral.”
Idaho Code § 73-402(3): 2 cases
Hyde v. Fisher, 152 P.3d 653 (Idaho Ct. App. 2007). “Idaho Code Section 73-402 of the FERPA states, in full: (1) Free exercise of religion is a fundamental right that applies in this state, even if laws, rules or other government actions are facially neutral.”
Lewis v. State, Dept. of Transp., 146 P.3d 684 (Idaho Ct. App. 2006). “See I.C. § 73-402. Idaho Code Section 73-402 provides: (1) Free exercise of religion is a fundamental right that applies in this state, even if laws, rules or other government actions are facially neutral.”
Idaho Code § 73-402(3)(b): 1 case
Lewis v. State, Dept. of Transp., 146 P.3d 684 (Idaho Ct. App. 2006). “See I.C. § 73-402. Idaho Code Section 73-402 provides: (1) Free exercise of religion is a fundamental right that applies in this state, even if laws, rules or other government actions are facially neutral.”
Idaho Code § 73-402(4): 1 case
Hyde v. Fisher, 152 P.3d 653 (Idaho Ct. App. 2007). “Idaho Code Section 73-402 of the FERPA states, in full: (1) Free exercise of religion is a fundamental right that applies in this state, even if laws, rules or other government actions are facially neutral.”
Idaho Code § 73-402(5): 2 cases
Ricks v. State of Idaho Contractors Bd., 435 P.3d 1 (Idaho Ct. App. 2018). “(3) Government may substantially burden a person's exercise of religion only if it demonstrates that application of the burden to the person is both: (a) Essential to further a compelling governmental interest; (b) The least restrictive means of furthering that compelling…”
Ricks v. State of Idaho Contractors Bd., No. 45396 (Idaho Ct. App. Dec. 3, 2018). “(3) Government may substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion only if it demonstrates that application of the burden to the person is both: (a) Essential to further a compelling governmental interest; (b) The least restrictive means of furthering that compelling…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.