225 ILCS 10/1
This Act shall be known and may be cited as the Child Care Act of 1969
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(225 ILCS 10/1)
(from Ch. 23, par. 2211)
Sec. 1.
This Act shall be known and may be cited as the Child Care Act of 1969.
(Source: P.A. 76-63.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: Hawthorne v. Village of Olympia Fields
Hawthorne v. Village of Olympia Fields (2003)
“Under the Act, "[a]ny person, group of persons or corporation who *835 or which receives children or arranges for care or placement of one or more children unrelated to the operator" must apply for and obtain a license from the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS).”
Arangold Corp. v. Zehnder (1999)
“(West 1996)), the Child Care Act of 1969 (225 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 1996)), the Riverboat Gambling Act (230 ILCS 10/1 et seq.”
In re P.S. (2021)
“” See 725 ILCS 5/113-1 (West 2020) (statute on arraignment procedures provides that a criminal defendant shall “be called into open court, informed of the 3 By statute, the Act, the Child Care Act of 1969 (225 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 2020)), the Interstate Compact on the…”
People v. Lashawn F. (2003)
“This change to section 1(D)(m) of the Adoption Act was one of several measures adopted by the legislature as part of House Bill 165, which amended not only the Adoption Act, but several related acts: the Children and Family Services Act (20 ILCS 505/1 (West 1998)); the Child…”
Hawthorne v. Village of Olympia Fields (2002)
“The Child Care Act of 1969 (225 ILCS 10/1, et seq. (West 1998)) (the Child Care *478 Act), was adopted by the Illinois Legislature prior to the effective date of the 1970 Constitution which established the distinction between home rule and non-home rule units of local government.”
Bright Horizons Children's Centers, LLC v. Riverway Midwest II, LLC (2010)
“Licensing Requirements At the time the parties in the case at bar entered into the lease agreement, section 7(a) of the Illinois Child Care Act of 1969 (Act) (225 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 2006)) provided that “[DCFS] must prescribe and publish minimum standards for licensing that…”
Bailey v. Illinois Liquor Control Commission (2010)
“Day care facilities are governed by the Child Care Act of 1969 (225 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 2006)), not the School Code.”
People v. Majors (1999)
“(West 1998)) to exempt children placed with relatives pursuant to' the Child Care Act of 1969 (225 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 1998)), does not violate the single subject requirement where all of these changes were enacted to bring the operation of various state agencies into…”
Rogy's New Generation, Inc. v. Department of Revenue (2000)
“09 of the Child Care Act of 1969 [(225 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 1998))] which are operated by a not for profit corporation, society, association, foundation, institution or organization^]” 35 ILCS 105/2c (West 1998); 35 ILCS 120/2h (West 1998).”
Tri-Power Resources v. City of Carlyle (2012)
“¶ 17 When affirming the judgment of the appellate court, the supreme court observed that the Child Care Act of 1969 (225 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 2000)) gave DCFS the statewide authority to license and regulate home day cares, but “ ‘[n]otably absent’ ” from the statue was “ ‘any…”
Englum v. City of Charleston (2017)
“For example, in Hawthorne, the state legislature had enacted the Child Care Act of 1969 (225 ILCS 10/1 to 20 (West 2000)), which regulated child-care facilities and, in particular, day-care businesses operated out of residential homes.”
In Re DF (2003)
“This change to section 1(D)(m) of the Adoption Act was one of several measures adopted by the legislature as part of House Bill 165, which amended not only the Adoption Act, but several related acts: the Children and Family Services Act (20 ILCS 505/1 (West 1998)); the Child…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|