Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 11-8-8-1 (2026)
"Correctional facility"
✓ current as of May 2026
Sec. 1. As used in this chapter, "correctional facility" has the meaning set forth in IC 5-1.2-2.
As added by P.L.140-2006, SEC.13 and P.L.173-2006, SEC.13. Amended by P.L.189-2018, SEC.105.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2007–2023 · leading case: Healey v. State, 969 N.E.2d 607 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012).
Healey v. State, 969 N.E.2d 607 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). “Did the trial court correctly deny Healey’s motion to dismiss, based on his claim that the Indiana Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), I.C. §§ 11-8-8-1 through 11-8-8-22 (West, Westlaw through legislation effective May 31, 2012) constitutes an ex post facto law in violation of…”
Milliner v. State, 890 N.E.2d 789 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). “Code §§ 5-2-12-8 and 12-9 (repealed); current sex offender registration provisions are codified at Ind.Code §§ 11-8-8-1 to-22. [2] The record is unclear whether the court used the failure to register conviction as another basis of probation revocation, as the "Order Revoking…”
Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407 (2008). “730, §§ 150/1 to 150/10, 152/ 101 to 152/121 (2006); Ind. Code §§ 11-8-8-1 to 11-8-8-7 (Supp. 2007); Iowa Code Ann.”
United States v. Kebodeaux, 570 U.S. 387 (2013). “…§§ 18-8304 to 18-8311 (Supp.2008); Ill. Comp. Stat., ch. 730, §§ 150/1 to 150/10, 152/101 to 152/121 (West 2006) ; Ind.Code §§ 11-8-8-1 to 11-8-8-7 (Supp.2007); Iowa Code §§ 692A.1 to 692A.16 (2003 and Supp. 2008); Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 22-4901 to 22-4910 (1995); Ky.Rev.Stat.…”
Brian Hope v. Comm'r of Indiana Depart, 9 F.4th 513 (7th Cir. 2021). “Ind. Code § 11-8-8-1 et seq. By virtue of the State su- preme court’s construction of the Indiana Constitution, Indi- ana’s Ex Post Facto Clause prohibits retroactive application of SORA to offenders convicted before its enactment unless the marginal effects of doing so would not…”
Jerome Michael Burton v. State of Indiana, 977 N.E.2d 1004 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). “See Ind.Code §§ 11-8-8-1 to -22. The version of our SORA under which Burton is required to register first became effective in 2006.”
Daniel J. Hollen v. State of Indiana, 994 N.E.2d 1166 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013). “Code §§ 5-2-12-1 to 5-2-12-13) (current version at Ind.Code §§ 11-8-8-1 to 11 — 8—8— 22). In 1994, the Act, among other things, required probationers and parolees convicted of child molesting on or after June 30, 1994 to register as sex offenders.”
Dickie D. Bridges v. State of Indiana, 109 N.E.3d 453 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018). “1 Ind. Code § 11-8-8-17 (a)(1). 2 Ind. Code § 11-8-8-1 et seq.”
Brian Hope v. Comm'r of Indiana Dep't of Corr., 66 F.4th 647 (7th Cir. 2023). “The Indiana Sex Offender Registra- tion Act (SORA), Ind. Code § 11-8-8-1 et seq., requires sex of- fenders who study, work, or reside in Indiana to register with the State.”
Buss v. Harris, 926 N.E.2d 1110 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). “…Act of March 2, 1994, Pub.L. No. 11-1994, § 7 (codified as Indiana Code §§ 5-2-12-1[;] 5-2-12-18) (current version at Indiana Code §§ 11-8-8-1[;11-8-8-22). The Act contained both registration and notification provisions, ie., sex offenders were required to take affirmative…”
Jones v. State, 873 N.E.2d 725 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). “See I.C. §§ 11-8-8-1 to 11-8-8-22 (providing guidelines for registration).”
C.E.K. v. State, 928 N.E.2d 258 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). “See I.C. §§ 11-8-8-1 to -22. Section 11-8-8-5(b)(2) includes the following within the definition of "sex or violent offender": a child who has committed a delinquent act and who: (A) is at least fourteen (14) years of age; (B) is on probation, is on parole, is discharged from a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.