Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 14-26-2-23 (2026)

Prohibited activities; permit; applications; fees; rules; mediation; civil enforcement

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 23. (a) Unless a person obtains a permit from the department under this section and conducts the activities according to the terms of the permit, a person may not conduct the following activities:

(1) Over, along, or lakeward of the shoreline or water line of a public freshwater lake:

(A) excavate;

(B) place fill; or

(C) place, modify, or repair a temporary or permanent structure.

(2) Construct a wall whose lowest point would be:

(A) below the elevation of the shoreline or water line; and

(B) within ten (10) feet landward of the shoreline or water line, as measured perpendicularly from the shoreline or water line;

of a public freshwater lake.

(3) Change the water level, area, or depth of a public freshwater lake or the location of the shoreline or water line.

     (b) An application for a permit for an activity described in subsection (a) must be accompanied by the following:

(1) A nonrefundable minimum fee of one hundred dollars ($100).

(2) A project plan that provides the department with sufficient information concerning the proposed excavation, fill, temporary structure, or permanent structure.

(3) A written acknowledgment from the landowner that any additional water area created under the project plan is part of the public freshwater lake and is dedicated to the general public use with the public rights described in section 5 of this chapter.

     (c) The department may issue a permit after investigating the merits of the application. In determining the merits of the application, the department may consider any factor, including cumulative effects of the proposed activity upon the following:

(1) The shoreline, water line, or bed of the public freshwater lake.

(2) The fish, wildlife, or botanical resources.

(3) The public rights described in section 5 of this chapter.

(4) The management of watercraft operations under IC 14-15.

(5) The interests of a landowner having property rights abutting the public freshwater lake or rights to access the public freshwater lake.

     (d) A contractor or agent of the landowner who engages in an activity described in subsection (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) must comply with the terms of a permit issued under this section.

     (e) The commission shall adopt rules under IC 4-22-2 to do the following:

(1) Assist in the administration of this chapter.

(2) Provide objective standards for issuing permits under this section, including standards for the configuration of piers, boat stations, platforms, and similar structures. The standards:

(A) may provide for a common use if the standard is needed to accommodate the interests of landowners having:

(i) property rights abutting the public freshwater lake; or

(ii) rights to access the public freshwater lake; and

(B) shall exempt any class of activities, including the construction or placement of temporary structures, from licensing if the commission finds that the class is unlikely to pose more than a minimal potential for harm to the public rights described in section 5 of this chapter. The commission may adopt rules regarding the conditions upon which an activity under this clause is permitted without a license.

(3) Subject to IC 14-10-2-1, set the permit application fee at or above the minimum fee established in subsection (b).

As added by P.L.64-2000, SEC.1. Amended by P.L.152-2006, SEC.3; P.L.6-2008, SEC.10; P.L.25-2009, SEC.2; P.L.195-2017, SEC.41; P.L.191-2023, SEC.6; P.L.164-2024, SEC.12.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2011–2019 · leading case: Bowyer v. Indiana Dep't of Nat. Resources, 944 N.E.2d 972 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011).
Bowyer v. Indiana Dep't of Nat. Resources, 944 N.E.2d 972 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “152-2006, § 4 , and was replaced by Ind.Code § 14-26-2-23, as amended, which states in relevant part: (a) Unless a person obtains a permit from the department under this section and conducts the activities according to the terms of the permit, a person may not conduct the…”
Kranz v. Meyers Subdivision Prop. Owners Ass'n, 969 N.E.2d 1068 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 8× “Ind.Code § 14-26-2-23. The DNR contends that Indiana Code Section 14-26-2-23 authorizes it to determine property and riparian rights to the extent necessary to implement the permit process.”
Indiana Dep't of Nat. Resources v. Kevin Prosser (Ind. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 6× “Ind. Code § 14-26-2-23 (a)(2). A “‘public freshwater lake’ means a lake that has been used by the public with the acquiescence of a riparian owner” but does not include Lake Michigan or certain other lakes.”
Gunther Kranz & Carol Kranz v. Meyers Subdivision Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc., Christopher Bartoszek, & Indiana Dept. of Nat. Resources (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 6× “Ind. Code § 14-26-2-23 . The DNR contends that Indiana Code Section 14-26-2-23 authorizes it to determine property and riparian rights to the extent necessary to implement the permit process.”
Ind. Code § 14-26-2-23(c): 1 case
Kranz v. Meyers Subdivision Prop. Owners Ass'n, 969 N.E.2d 1068 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). “Ind.Code § 14-26-2-23. The DNR contends that Indiana Code Section 14-26-2-23 authorizes it to determine property and riparian rights to the extent necessary to implement the permit process.”
Ind. Code § 14-26-2-23(e)(3): 1 case
Kranz v. Meyers Subdivision Prop. Owners Ass'n, 969 N.E.2d 1068 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). “Ind.Code § 14-26-2-23. The DNR contends that Indiana Code Section 14-26-2-23 authorizes it to determine property and riparian rights to the extent necessary to implement the permit process.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.