Sec. 9. No person may offer or sell any franchise:
(1) unless the franchise is registered under this chapter or is
exempt from such registration under sections 3 through 5 of this
chapter; and
(2) without first providing to the prospective franchisee at least
ten (10) days prior to the execution by the prospective franchisee
of a binding franchise or at least ten (10) days prior to the receipt
by the franchisor of any consideration, whichever first occurs, a
disclosure statement together with a copy of all proposed
contracts relating to the sale of a franchise.
Formerly: Acts 1975, P.L.262, SEC.1. As amended by
P.L.233-1985, SEC.2.
Notes of Decisions
Cont'l Basketball Ass'n v. Ellenstein Enter., Inc., 669 N.E.2d 134 (Ind. 1996).
· cites it 2× “Ind.Code § 23-2-2.5-9. The statute then proceeds to authorize the Indiana securities commissioner to investigate possible violations of the statute, to issue cease and desist orders, and to seek to both enjoin noncompliance and enforce compliance with the statute.”
Drake v. Maid-Rite Co., 681 N.E.2d 734 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997).
· cites it 2× “She contends that if Sweeden was Maid-Rite’s agent, the sale of the franchise was “effected by or through a franchisor” as prescribed in Indiana Code § 23-2-2.5-4. She concludes that since the sale was “effected by or through a franchisor,” Maid-Rite failed to provide a…”
Cont'l Basketball Ass'n v. Ellenstein Enter., Inc., 640 N.E.2d 705 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994).
“Indiana Code 23-2-2.5-9 provides that “[n]o person may offer or sell any franchise unless the franchise is registered under this chapter or is exempt and without first providing to the prospective franchisee at least ten days prior to the franchisee’s execution of a binding…”
Hardee's of Maumelle, Arkansas, Inc. v. Hardee's Food Sys., Inc., 31 F.3d 573 (7th Cir. 1994).
· cites it 3× “1 The plaintiffs appeal only from the summary judgment in favor of Hardee’s on the claim that Hardee’s violated the disclosure provisions of the Indiana Franchise Act (IFA), Ind.Code §§ 23-2-2.5-9 & 10. The district court held a bench trial on the remaining claims alleging fraud…”
Ind. Code § 23-2-2.5-9(2): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.