Sec. 3. (a) Except under subsection (c), if it is alleged
and the court finds that:
(1) the individual for whom the guardian is sought is an
incapacitated person or a minor; and
(2) the appointment of a guardian is necessary as a means of
providing care and supervision of the physical person or property
of the incapacitated person or minor;
the court shall appoint a guardian under this chapter.
(b) If it is alleged and the court finds that the welfare of an
incapacitated person would be best served by limiting the scope of the
guardianship, the court shall make the appointive or other orders under
this chapter to:
(1) encourage development of the incapacitated person's
self-improvement, self-reliance, and independence; and
(2) contribute to the incapacitated person's living as normal a life
as that person's condition and circumstances permit without
psychological or physical harm to the incapacitated person.
(c) If the court finds that it is not in the best interests of the
incapacitated person or minor to appoint a guardian, the court may:
(1) treat the petition as one for a protective order and proceed
accordingly;
(2) enter any other appropriate order; or
(3) dismiss the proceedings.
As added by P.L.169-1988, SEC.1. Amended by P.L.33-1989,
SEC.69.
Notes of Decisions
Hickman v. Hickman, 805 N.E.2d 808 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 4× “Joseph points out that an inconsistency exists between the right to request a jury trial and Ind.Code § 29-3-5-3({a), which provides that "the court shall appoint a guardian" if the petition alleges and the "court finds that: (1) the individual for whom the guardian is sought is…”
Conrad v. Atkins, 868 N.E.2d 878 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 4× “” I.C. § 29-3-5-3(b). The trial court was also required to order appropriate relief if it found that the At-kinses were not acting in Patrick’s best interest.”
In Re the Guardianship of A.L.C., 902 N.E.2d 343 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 2× “However, before a court is required to appoint a guardian for a minor, the court must find that the appointment is "necessary as a means of providing care and supervision of the physical person or property of the .”
In Re Guardianship of JK, 862 N.E.2d 686 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 2× “Code § 29-3-5-3, a trial court may appoint a guardian to a minor if "the appointment of a guardian is necessary as a means of providing care and supervision of the physical person or property of the incapacitated person or minor.”
Cook v. Harris, 852 N.E.2d 933 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 2× “Specifically, Indiana Code Section 29-3-5-3 provides that the trial court "shall appoint a guardian" if the trial court finds that; "(1) the individual for whom the guardian is sought is an incapacitated person or a minor; and (2) the appointment of a guardian is necessary as a…”
Hinkley v. Chapman, 817 N.E.2d 1288 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 4× “2 Ind.Code § 29-3-5-3(a)(2) (Burns Code Ed.”
In the Matter of the Guardianship of B.W. E.W. v. L.G., 45 N.E.3d 860 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 2× “Indiana Code section 29-3-5-3(a) provides the standard for appointment of a guardian: [I]f it is alleged and the court finds that: (1) the individual for whom the guardian is sought is an incapacitated person or a minor; and (2) the appointment of a guardian is necessary as a…”
Ault v. Brewer, 922 N.E.2d 82 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 2× “Indiana Code section 29-3-5-3 provides that if a guardianship is sought for an incapacitated person or a minor and "the appointment of a guardian is necessary as a means of providing care and supervision of the physical person or property of the incapacitated person or minor;…”
V.S.D. v. Williams-Huston, 660 N.E.2d 1064 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996).
“CODE § 29-3-5-3(c) (1993). . As used in IC 16-36-1-5, health care means "any care, treatment, service, or procedure to maintain, diagnose, or treat an individual's physical or mental condition.”
— Ind. Code § 29-3-5-3(a) — 11 cases
Hickman v. Hickman, 805 N.E.2d 808 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004).
“Joseph points out that an inconsistency exists between the right to request a jury trial and Ind.Code § 29-3-5-3({a), which provides that "the court shall appoint a guardian" if the petition alleges and the "court finds that: (1) the individual for whom the guardian is sought is…”
In the Matter of the Guardianship of B.W. E.W. v. L.G., 45 N.E.3d 860 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015).
“Indiana Code section 29-3-5-3(a) provides the standard for appointment of a guardian: [I]f it is alleged and the court finds that: (1) the individual for whom the guardian is sought is an incapacitated person or a minor; and (2) the appointment of a guardian is necessary as a…”
— Ind. Code § 29-3-5-3(a)(2) — 3 cases
In Re the Guardianship of A.L.C., 902 N.E.2d 343 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009).
“However, before a court is required to appoint a guardian for a minor, the court must find that the appointment is "necessary as a means of providing care and supervision of the physical person or property of the .”
Hinkley v. Chapman, 817 N.E.2d 1288 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004).
“2 Ind.Code § 29-3-5-3(a)(2) (Burns Code Ed.”
— Ind. Code § 29-3-5-3(b) — 2 cases
Conrad v. Atkins, 868 N.E.2d 878 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
“” I.C. § 29-3-5-3(b). The trial court was also required to order appropriate relief if it found that the At-kinses were not acting in Patrick’s best interest.”
— Ind. Code § 29-3-5-3(c) — 2 cases
V.S.D. v. Williams-Huston, 660 N.E.2d 1064 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996).
“CODE § 29-3-5-3(c) (1993). . As used in IC 16-36-1-5, health care means "any care, treatment, service, or procedure to maintain, diagnose, or treat an individual's physical or mental condition.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.