Sec. 2. (a) A candidate who desires:
(1) a recount of votes cast for a nomination or election subject to
this chapter; or
(2) to contest a nomination subject to this chapter or the election
of a state office other than governor or lieutenant governor;
must file a verified petition with the election division not earlier than
noon ten (10) days after election day and not later than noon fourteen
(14) days after election day.
(b) A state or county chairman who is entitled to and desires to file
a petition for a recount or contest under this chapter must file a verified
petition with the election division not earlier than noon ten (10) days
after election day and not later than noon seventeen (17) days after
election day.
As added by P.L.7-1986, SEC.19. Amended by P.L.3-1987,
SEC.397; P.L.10-1988, SEC.168; P.L.4-1996, SEC.82; P.L.3-1997,
SEC.367; P.L.221-2005, SEC.122; P.L.240-2025, SEC.31.
Notes of Decisions
White v. Indiana Democratic Party Ex Rel. Parker, 963 N.E.2d 481 (Ind. 2012).
· cites it 16× “Code § 3-12-11-1(b)(2) (2005); see also Ind.Code § 3-12-11-2 (2005). In addition to various administrative requirements, such a petition must state as the grounds for the contest that the petitioner in good faith believes that one (1) or more of the following occurred: (A) The…”
Pullins v. Eldridge, No. 1:20-cv-01311 (S.D. Ind. Sept. 26, 2022).
· cites it 2× “Under Ind. Code § 3-12-11-2 , a dissatisfied candidate who desires a recount or to contest a nomination or election "must file a verified petition with the election division not later than noon fourteen (14) days after election day.”
Ind. Code § 3-12-11-2(a): 1 case
White v. Indiana Democratic Party Ex Rel. Parker, 963 N.E.2d 481 (Ind. 2012).
“Code § 3-12-11-1(b)(2) (2005); see also Ind.Code § 3-12-11-2 (2005). In addition to various administrative requirements, such a petition must state as the grounds for the contest that the petitioner in good faith believes that one (1) or more of the following occurred: (A) The…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.