Sec. 3. (Application and Interpretation of the Rules of
Law and the Terms of the Trust)
The rules of law contained in this article shall be interpreted and
applied to the terms of the trust so as to implement the intent of the
settlor and the purposes of the trust. If the rules of law and the terms of
the trust conflict, the terms of the trust shall control unless the rules of
law clearly prohibit or restrict the article which the terms of the trust
purport to authorize.
Formerly: Acts 1971, P.L.416, SEC.2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
19
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case:
In Re Est. of Meyer, 747 N.E.2d 1159 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001).
In Re Est. of Meyer, 747 N.E.2d 1159 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 2× “1992) (citing Ind. Code § 30-4-1-3 (requiring that courts "implement the intent of the settlor and the purposes of the trust"); Powell v.”
Malachowski v. Bank One, Indianapolis, 590 N.E.2d 559 (Ind. 1992).
“The Beneficiaries argue that Bank One breached its fiduciary duty when it failed to follow the express intent of the settlor that the Lilly stock be retained in the Trust.”
Marshall & Ilsley Trust Co., N.A. v. Woodward, 848 N.E.2d 1175 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 2× “” Ind.Code § 30-4-1-3. If there is a conflict, “the terms of the trust shall control unless the rules of law clearly prohibit or restrict the article which the terms of the trust purport to authorize.”
Hinds v. McNair, 413 N.E.2d 586 (Ind. Ct. App. 1980).
“We feel both arguments, however, require the imposition of terms which supplement or contradict the intention of the settlors.”
In Re Valma M. Hanson Revocable Trust No. 103-83-1, 779 N.E.2d 1218 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002).
· cites it 2× “As the majority notes, Indiana's Trust Code provides that its rules of law are to "be interpreted and applied to the terms of the trust so as to implement the intent of the settlor and the purposes of the trust.”
Matter of Della Lustgarten Nathan Trust, 638 N.E.2d 789 (Ind. 1994).
· cites it 2× “" Ind. Code § 30-4-1-3 . Moreover, Ind. Code § 30-4-3-24 provides in relevant part: (a) On petition by a trustee or beneficiary, the court may, in its discretion, terminate the trust: (1) If the purpose of the trust has been fulfilled or has become illegal or impossible of…”
In Re Last Will & Testament of Stonecipher, 849 N.E.2d 1191 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 2× “" Ind.Code § 30-4-1-3. We examine the trust document as a whole to determine the plain and unambiguous purpose of the settlor as that intent appears within the four corners of the instrument.”
Graninger v. Nat'l City Bank, 849 N.E.2d 1191 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 2× “” Ind.Code § 30-4-1-3. We examine the trust document as a whole to determine the plain and unambiguous purpose of the settlor as that intent appears within the four corners of the instrument.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.