Ind. Code » Title 30
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 30-4-3-24 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Formerly: Acts 1971, P.L.416, SEC.4. Repealed by P.L.238-2005, SEC.63.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1980–2014 · leading case: Matter of Della Lustgarten Nathan Trust, 638 N.E.2d 789 (Ind. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matter of Della Lustgarten Nathan Trust, 638 N.E.2d 789 (Ind. 1994). · cites it 4× “Moreover, Ind. Code § 30-4-3-24 provides in relevant part: (a) On petition by a trustee or beneficiary, the court may, in its discretion, terminate the trust: (1) If the purpose of the trust has been fulfilled or has become illegal or impossible of fulfillment.”
Hinds v. McNair, 413 N.E.2d 586 (Ind. Ct. App. 1980). “These few exceptions have been codified under Ind.Code 30-4-3-24(a) which provides: “On petition by a trustee or beneficiary, the court may, in its discretion, terminate the trust: *603 (1) if the purpose of the trust has been fulfilled or has become illegal or impossible for…”
Haehl v. Montgomery, 954 N.E.2d 957 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “At the hearing, David indicated that, pursuant to Ind. Code § 30-4-3-24 .4, he was requesting that the court modify the trust and allow an individual (specifically, Crumbo) to serve as trustee because the “current arrangements are impractical and wasteful” *960 and because “the…”
In Re: Nancy J. McMillen Testamentary Trust, Donna M. McMillen v. Thomas Kane (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “” Ind. Code § 30-4-3-24 .4. This section, however, requires the existence of circumstances not anticipated by the settlor.”
Ind. Code § 30-4-3-24(a): 1 case
Hinds v. McNair, 413 N.E.2d 586 (Ind. Ct. App. 1980). “These few exceptions have been codified under Ind.Code 30-4-3-24(a) which provides: “On petition by a trustee or beneficiary, the court may, in its discretion, terminate the trust: *603 (1) if the purpose of the trust has been fulfilled or has become illegal or impossible for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.