Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 31-19-9-19 (2026)
Implied consent to adoption bar to adoption challenge
✓ current as of May 2026
Sec. 19. A person whose consent to adoption is irrevocably implied under section 18 of this chapter may not contest the adoption or the validity of the person's implied consent to the adoption.
As added by P.L.61-2003, SEC.14.
IC 31-19-10Chapter 10. Withdrawal of Consent to Adoption; Contest of
Adoption
31-19-10-0.5Standard of proof
31-19-10-1Persons permitted to contest adoption; deadline
for filing motion to contest; contents of motion to
contest
31-19-10-1.2Contested adoption; burden of proof; notice of
dismissal of motion to contest; motion to set aside
dismissal
31-19-10-1.4Basis for resolving contested adoption
31-19-10-2Notice of intent to withdraw consent or to contest
adoption
31-19-10-3Withdrawal of consent to adoption
31-19-10-4Limitation on withdrawing consent
31-19-10-4.5Contesting an adoption
31-19-10-5Hearing to contest adoption
31-19-10-6Determination of contest of adoption
31-19-10-7Service of notice of adoption contest; protection
of privacy of adoption petitioner
31-19-10-8Denial of putative father's adoption contest as bar
to establishing paternity
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2013–2017 · leading case: In The Matter of The Adoption of: K.M. B.M. v. J.R. & M.R., 31 N.E.3d 533 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015).
In The Matter of The Adoption of: K.M. B.M. v. J.R. & M.R., 31 N.E.3d 533 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015). “” See I.C. § 31-19-9-19 (West, Westlaw current with all legislation of the 2015 First Regular Session of the 119th General Assembly effective through March.”
In Re: The Petition for the Adoption of: R.J. & S.J. (Minor Child.), R.J. & L.L. v. A.G. & B.G., No. 02A03-1209-AD-403 (Ind. Ct. App. May 24, 2013). “Father’s Motion to Contest the Adoptions Determination that Indiana Code Section 31-19-9-18 is a Nonclaim Statute Indiana Code section 31-19-9-19 provides that a person whose consent to adoption is irrevocably implied may not contest either the adoption or the validity of the…”
In re: The Adoption of C.G.C., M.T. v. C.C. & S.C. (mem dec.), No. 12A02-1607-AD-1759 (Ind. Ct. App. Oct. 31, 2017). “” Ind. Code § 31-19-9-19 . II. Analysis [6] In filing their motion for summary judgment, the Appellees requested the trial court to rule that M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.