Sec. 1. The following persons are entitled to be
represented by counsel:
(1) A child charged with a delinquent act, as provided by IC 31-32-2-2.
(2) A parent, in a proceeding to terminate the parent-child
relationship, as provided by IC 31-32-2-5.
(3) Any other person designated by law.
[Pre-1997 Recodification Citations: 31-6-3-1(b) part;
31-6-3-2(c) part; part New.]
As added by P.L.1-1997, SEC.15.
Notes of Decisions
J.A. v. Indiana Dep't of Child Servs., 4 N.E.3d 1158 (Ind. 2014).
· cites it 4× “And Indiana Code section 31-32-4-1 likewise includes, among its list of persons entitled to counsel, “[a]ny other person designated by law.”
Lang v. Starke Cnty. Off. of Fam. & Child., 861 N.E.2d 366 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 2× “Ind.Code §§ 31-32-4-1; 31-32-2-5. However, the inquiry into whether counsel’s assistance was effective is not the Strickland 5 inquiry used in criminal cases; instead “the focus of the inquiry [is] whether it appears that the parents received a fundamentally fair trial whose…”
K.S. v. Marion Cnty. Dep't of Child Servs., 917 N.E.2d 158 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 3× “Code § 31-32-2-5 ; see also I.C. § 31-32-4-1. [5] It is not disputed in this appeal that Mother's trial counsel properly informed the court of Mother's last known address.”
S. R. v. M. J., 71 N.E.3d 436 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “Furthermore, Indiana Code section 31-32-4-1(2) states that “[a] parent, in a proceeding to terminate the parent-child relationship” is “entitled to be represented by counsel.”
In Re Adoption of GWB, 776 N.E.2d 952 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002).
· cites it 2× “" In addition, Ind.Code § 31-32-4-1 provides: "The following persons are entitled to be represented by counsel: .”
Brooks v. McGee, 776 N.E.2d 952 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002).
· cites it 2× “” In addition, Ind.Code § 31-32-4-1 provides: “The following persons are entitled to be represented by counsel: .”
In Re Lb, 889 N.E.2d 326 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 2× “at 1039 ; see also Ind.Code Ann. § 31-32-4-1 (West, PREMISE through 2007 1st Regular Sess.”
In Re the Adoption of K.W.: M.W. v. S.L. & T.L., 21 N.E.3d 96 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 2× “It noted: Reading the juvenile statutes collectively, Section 31-32-4-1 provides that parents in TPR proceedings are entitled to be represented by counsel, along with “[a]ny other person designated by law.”
Ind. Code § 31-32-4-1(2): 2 cases
S. R. v. M. J., 71 N.E.3d 436 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017).
“Furthermore, Indiana Code section 31-32-4-1(2) states that “[a] parent, in a proceeding to terminate the parent-child relationship” is “entitled to be represented by counsel.”
Ind. Code § 31-32-4-1(3): 1 case
J.A. v. Indiana Dep't of Child Servs., 4 N.E.3d 1158 (Ind. 2014).
“And Indiana Code section 31-32-4-1 likewise includes, among its list of persons entitled to counsel, “[a]ny other person designated by law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.