Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 31-37-22-7 (2026)
Repealed
✓ current as of May 2026
[Pre-1997 Recodification Citation: 31-6-7-16(d).]
As added by P.L.1-1997, SEC.20. Repealed by P.L.187-2015, SEC.33.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2000–2002 · leading case: L.L. v. State, 774 N.E.2d 554 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002).
L.L. v. State, 774 N.E.2d 554 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). “Furthermore, Indiana Code section 31-37-22-7 provides that “[i]f the juvenile court modifies its disposition order under section 5 or 6 of this chapter, the court may order the child placed under one (1) of the following alternatives: .”
A.M.R. v. State, 741 N.E.2d 727 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000). “See Ind.Code § 31-37-22-7 (providing, in relevant part, that “[i]f the juvenile court modifies its disposition order under section 5 or 6 of this chapter, the court may order the child placed .”
AMR v. State, 741 N.E.2d 727 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000). “See Ind.Code § 31-37-22-7 (providing, in relevant part, that "[i]f the juvenile court modifies its disposition order under section 5 or 6 of this chapter, the court may order the child placed .”
LL v. State, 774 N.E.2d 554 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). “Furthermore, Indiana Code section 31-37-22-7 provides that "[i]f the juvenile court modifies its disposition order under section 5 or 6 of this chapter, the court may order the child placed under one (1) of the following alternatives:.”
Ind. Code § 31-37-22-7(a)(5): 2 cases
L.L. v. State, 774 N.E.2d 554 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). “Furthermore, Indiana Code section 31-37-22-7 provides that “[i]f the juvenile court modifies its disposition order under section 5 or 6 of this chapter, the court may order the child placed under one (1) of the following alternatives: .”
LL v. State, 774 N.E.2d 554 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). “Furthermore, Indiana Code section 31-37-22-7 provides that "[i]f the juvenile court modifies its disposition order under section 5 or 6 of this chapter, the court may order the child placed under one (1) of the following alternatives:.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.