Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 32-24-1-1 (2026)
"Condemnor" defined
✓ current as of May 2026
Sec. 1. As used in section 5 of this chapter, "condemnor" means any person authorized by Indiana law to exercise the power of eminent domain.
[Pre-2002 Recodification Citation: 32-11-1-2.1 part.]
As added by P.L.2-2002, SEC.9.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2003–2026 · leading case: Lake Cent. Sch. Corp. v. Hawk Dev. Corp., 793 N.E.2d 1080 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003).
Lake Cent. Sch. Corp. v. Hawk Dev. Corp., 793 N.E.2d 1080 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). “sections 32-24-1-1 to -17 (West 2002). [2] At that time, the Eminent Domain Act stated in part: "The filing of such complaint shall constitute notice of such proceedings to all subsequent purchasers and encumbrances of the property, who shall be bound thereby.”
Burd Mgmt., LLC v. State, 831 N.E.2d 104 (Ind. 2005). “18, § 287 at 916-17. Then in 2002, the General Assembly re-codified the Indiana Domain Act, including Indiana Code Section 32-11-1-9 and its 1990 amendments, at Indiana Code Sections 32-24-1-1 through 32-24-6-2.”
Hass v. State-Dep't of Transp., 843 N.E.2d 994 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006). “The procedure for the exercise of eminent domain is outlined at Indiana Code § 32-24-1-1 et seq. This Court has summarized the process as follows: First, when the complaint is filed a notice is issued and served on the landowner requesting his appearance at a stated time to show…”
Evansville Greenway & Remediation Trust v. S. Indiana Gas & Elec. Co., 661 F. Supp. 2d 989 (S.D. Ind. 2009). “” Also, at least in Indiana, eminent domain is governed by Ind.Code § 32-24-1-1 et seq. Indiana Code § 32-24-l~3(a) directs that “any person that may exercise the power of eminent domain for any public use under any statute may exercise the power only in the manner provided in…”
State v. Universal Outdoor, Inc., 864 N.E.2d 403 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). “When a condemnor files a complaint to exercise this power, a notice is issued and served on the landowner, which requests his appearance at a stated time to show cause, if any, as to why the property sought to be condemned should not be acquired.”
Indiana Land Trust 3082 v. Hammond Redevelopment Comm'n, No. 2:21-cv-00201 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 25, 2023). “I.C. §§ 32-24-1-1, et seq. Plaintiffs may also take an interlocutory appeal if their objections to the taking are overruled.”
Bezingue v. Steuben Lakes Reg'l Waste Dist., No. 1:19-cv-00081 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 14, 2020). “See Ind. Code § 32-24-1-1 - et seq. This procedure would identify the precise land sought to be acquired, I.”
Kratzer Farms Inc. v. Indiana Grain Buyers & Warehouse Licensing Agency, No. 1:22-cv-00213 (N.D. Ind. Nov. 1, 2022). “State Law Takings Claim In response to Defendant’s assertion that there is no private cause of action under the Indiana constitution, Plaintiffs assert that they have a claim under Indiana’s inverse condemnation statute, Ind. Code § 32-24-1-1 , et seq. Defendant counters by…”
Indiana Land Trust 3082 v. Hammond Redevelopment Comm'n, No. 25S-PL-00141 (Ind. Feb. 24, 2026). “See I.C. §§ 32-24-1-1 through -17 (setting forth general procedures for the exercise of eminent domain); I.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.