Ind. Code » Title 32
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 32-28-3-8 (2026)

Insufficient proceeds of sale

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 8. If the proceeds of the sale of the property subject to a lien are insufficient to pay all the claimants, the court shall order the claimants to be paid in proportion to the amount due each claimant.

[Pre-2002 Recodification Citation: 32-8-3-8.]

As added by P.L.2-2002, SEC.13.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2004–2010 · leading case: Gill v. Pollert, 810 N.E.2d 1050 (Ind. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gill v. Pollert, 810 N.E.2d 1050 (Ind. 2004). · cites it 2× “Initially, the Gills contend that Onyx did not follow the statutory requirements under Indiana Code § 32-28-3-8(a) by failing to provide evidence that Onyx filed a duplicate notice when it filed its Notice of Intention to Hold Mechanic's Lien with the County Recorder.”
Capital Drywall Supply, Inc. v. Jai Jagdish, Inc., 934 N.E.2d 1193 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “Nevertheless, Capital Drywall and Old Fort contend that they substantially complied with the notice requirements in Indiana Code Section 32-28-3-8. First, Capital Drywall relies on "unrefuted evidence concerning the name of the parcel owner provided to Capital Drywall by an…”
Cho v. Purdue Rsch. Found., 803 N.E.2d 1161 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Thus, the filing of Ace Construcetion's mechanic's lien was after the 90-day time period as required by Indiana Code section 32-28-3-8. Nonetheless, Cho argues that Ace Construction provided labor and materials for the clean room up to and beyond Opto-lynx's contract termination…”
Ind. Code § 32-28-3-8(a): 1 case
Gill v. Pollert, 810 N.E.2d 1050 (Ind. 2004). “Initially, the Gills contend that Onyx did not follow the statutory requirements under Indiana Code § 32-28-3-8(a) by failing to provide evidence that Onyx filed a duplicate notice when it filed its Notice of Intention to Hold Mechanic's Lien with the County Recorder.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.