Ind. Code » Title 32
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 32-35-2-35 (2026)

Assessment of value of property and damages

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 35. In actions for the recovery of specific personal property, the jury must assess:

(1) the value of the property; and

(2) the damages for the taking or detention of the property;

when the jury's verdict results in a judgment for the recovery or return of the property.

[Pre-2002 Recodification Citation: 34-21-10-1.]

As added by P.L.2-2002, SEC.20.

 

IC 32-36ARTICLE 36. PUBLICITY

 

           Ch. 1.Rights of Publicity

 

IC 32-36-1Chapter 1. Rights of Publicity

 

           32-36-1-0.2Application of certain amendments to prior law
           32-36-1-1Application of chapter
           32-36-1-2"Commercial purpose" defined
           32-36-1-3"Name" defined
           32-36-1-4"News reporting or an entertainment medium" defined
           32-36-1-5"Person" defined
           32-36-1-6"Personality" defined
           32-36-1-7"Right of publicity" defined
           32-36-1-8Consent required for commercial use of a personality's right of publicity; application to the rights of a deceased personality
           32-36-1-9Jurisdictional acts
           32-36-1-10Damages
           32-36-1-11Profits derived from unauthorized use; proof
           32-36-1-12Additional remedies
           32-36-1-13Injunctive relief; enforceability against news reporting or entertainment medium
           32-36-1-14Impoundment of materials pending resolution of action
           32-36-1-15Destruction or other disposition of offending materials
           32-36-1-16Property rights
           32-36-1-17Exercise and enforcement of rights and remedies
           32-36-1-18Exercise and enforcement of rights and remedies following death of intestate personality; fractional interests
           32-36-1-19Termination of untransferred rights following personality's death
           32-36-1-20Rights and remedies supplemental to others provided by law

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2013–2013 · leading case: John P. Schaub v. The Est. of Edward G. Schaub & David Schaub, Pers. Rep. (Ind. Ct. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
John P. Schaub v. The Est. of Edward G. Schaub & David Schaub, Pers. Rep. (Ind. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 4× “171 with effective dates through May 7, 2013) 5 (assigning to the fact-finder the task of assessing the damages for the detention of the property). As John aptly points out, a replevin action is premised upon the fact that possession of the personal property in question was…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.