Ind. Code » Title 33
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 33-31-1-9 (2026)

Jurisdiction

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 9. All probate courts have:

(1) original and concurrent jurisdiction in all civil cases and in all criminal cases;

(2) de novo appellate jurisdiction of appeals from city and town courts; and

(3) in Marion County, de novo appellate jurisdiction of appeals from township small claims courts established under IC 33-34.

[Pre-2004 Recodification Citations: 33-8-2-9; 33-8-2-10.]

As added by P.L.98-2004, SEC.10. Amended by P.L.201-2011, SEC.28.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2005–2010 · leading case: Keenan v. Butler, 869 N.E.2d 1284 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Keenan v. Butler, 869 N.E.2d 1284 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “See Ind.Code §§ 33-31-1-9, 33-28-1-2. Had Judd's estate been opened in St.”
St. Joseph Cnty. Commissioners v. Nemeth, 929 N.E.2d 703 (Ind. 2010). · cites it 2× “Joseph County pursuant to Indiana Code section 33-31-1-9(b), operates the Thomas M.”
In Re Adoption of Hlw, Jr., 931 N.E.2d 400 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “" Ind.Code § 33-31-1-9(b). Consequently, the trial court here had subject matter jurisdiction over both the adoption and CHINS actions.”
H.L.W. v. L.M.D., 931 N.E.2d 400 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “" Ind.Code § 33-31-1-9(b). Consequently, the trial court here had subject matter jurisdiction over both the adoption and CHINS actions.”
In the Matter of Mandate of Funds St. Joseph Cnty. Commissioners & St. Joseph Cnty. Council v. The Hon. Peter J. Nemeth & the St. Joseph Prob. Court (Ind. 2010). · cites it 2× “Joseph County pursuant to Indiana Code Section 33-31-1-9(b), operates the Thomas M.”
In re R.L.H., 831 N.E.2d 250 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “See Ind.Code § 33-31-1-9(b). While we acknowledge that this court's dual jurisdiction is unique, we do not agree that it provides the court with unlimited authority over the juveniles appearing before it.”
— Ind. Code § 33-31-1-9(b) — 5 cases
St. Joseph Cnty. Commissioners v. Nemeth, 929 N.E.2d 703 (Ind. 2010). “Joseph County pursuant to Indiana Code section 33-31-1-9(b), operates the Thomas M.”
In Re Adoption of Hlw, Jr., 931 N.E.2d 400 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). “" Ind.Code § 33-31-1-9(b). Consequently, the trial court here had subject matter jurisdiction over both the adoption and CHINS actions.”
H.L.W. v. L.M.D., 931 N.E.2d 400 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). “" Ind.Code § 33-31-1-9(b). Consequently, the trial court here had subject matter jurisdiction over both the adoption and CHINS actions.”
In the Matter of Mandate of Funds St. Joseph Cnty. Commissioners & St. Joseph Cnty. Council v. The Hon. Peter J. Nemeth & the St. Joseph Prob. Court (Ind. 2010). “Joseph County pursuant to Indiana Code Section 33-31-1-9(b), operates the Thomas M.”
In re R.L.H., 831 N.E.2d 250 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). “See Ind.Code § 33-31-1-9(b). While we acknowledge that this court's dual jurisdiction is unique, we do not agree that it provides the court with unlimited authority over the juveniles appearing before it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.