Sec. 16. An appointed judicial officer shall be
vested by the judges of the family division with suitable powers for the
handling of all probate matters of the court, including the following:
(1) Fixing of all bonds.
(2) Auditing accounts of estates, guardianships, and trusts.
(3) Accepting reports, accounts, and settlements filed in the court.
(4) Appointing personal representatives, guardians, and trustees.
(5) Probating wills.
(6) Taking or hearing evidence on or concerning matters
described in this subsection or any other probate, guardianship, or
trust matters in litigation before the court.
(7) Enforcing court rules.
(8) Making reports to the court concerning the judicial officer's
doings in the proceedings described in this subsection, including
reports concerning the judicial officer's findings and conclusions
regarding the proceedings.
[Pre-2004 Recodification Citation: 33-5.1-2-11.]
As added by P.L.98-2004, SEC.12. Amended by P.L.162-2020,
SEC.11; P.L.106-2022, SEC.2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
9
cases, 2008–2019 · leading case:
In Re Hawkins, 902 N.E.2d 231 (Ind. 2009).
In Re Hawkins, 902 N.E.2d 231 (Ind. 2009).
· cites it 13× “A suspension from office without pay, regardless of duration, is not a minor sanction. Even more than a public reprimand, any such suspension is a significant blemish on a sitting judge's reputation.”
Smith v. State, 893 N.E.2d 1149 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 10× “I.C. § 33-33-49-16(e). Indiana Code section 33-23-5-8 provides: Except as provided under [Indiana Code sections 33-23-5-5(14) and 33-23-5-9(b)], a magistrate: (1) does not have the power of judicial mandate; and (2) may not enter a final appealable order unless sitting as a…”
Terry Smith v. State of Indiana, 982 N.E.2d 393 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 2× “2d at 673 (quoting Ind.Code § 33-33-49-16(e)). Magistrates, and thus master commissioners, are generally precluded from entering final orders.”
Ivy v. State, 947 N.E.2d 496 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 2× “” Ind.Code § 33-33-49-16 (2004). Our court has held that “although a master commissioner must keep the judge apprised of the matters before him, the judge need not approve the signature of the master commissioner’s statutorily authorized actions.”
Timothy Long v. State of Indiana, 962 N.E.2d 671 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× “Indiana Code section 33-33-49-16(e) (2004) provides that a Marion County master commissioner “has the powers and duties prescribed for a magistrate under IC 33-23-5-5 through IC 33-23-5-9.”
Ind. Code § 33-33-49-16(a): 2 cases
Ind. Code § 33-33-49-16(e): 6 cases
In Re Hawkins, 902 N.E.2d 231 (Ind. 2009).
“A suspension from office without pay, regardless of duration, is not a minor sanction. Even more than a public reprimand, any such suspension is a significant blemish on a sitting judge's reputation.”
Smith v. State, 893 N.E.2d 1149 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
“I.C. § 33-33-49-16(e). Indiana Code section 33-23-5-8 provides: Except as provided under [Indiana Code sections 33-23-5-5(14) and 33-23-5-9(b)], a magistrate: (1) does not have the power of judicial mandate; and (2) may not enter a final appealable order unless sitting as a…”
Terry Smith v. State of Indiana, 982 N.E.2d 393 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013).
“2d at 673 (quoting Ind.Code § 33-33-49-16(e)). Magistrates, and thus master commissioners, are generally precluded from entering final orders.”
Timothy Long v. State of Indiana, 962 N.E.2d 671 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012).
“Indiana Code section 33-33-49-16(e) (2004) provides that a Marion County master commissioner “has the powers and duties prescribed for a magistrate under IC 33-23-5-5 through IC 33-23-5-9.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.