Ind. Code » Title 33
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 33-37-5-8 (2026)

Alcohol and drug services program fee; law enforcement continuing education program fee

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 8. (a) This section applies to criminal, infraction, and ordinance violation actions. However, it does not apply to a case excluded under IC 33-37-4-2(d).

     (b) Subject to IC 12-23-14-16(d), the clerk shall collect the alcohol and drug services program fee set by the court under IC 12-23-14-16 in a county that has established an alcohol and drug services program.

     (c) In each action in which a defendant is found to have:

(1) committed a crime;

(2) violated a statute defining an infraction; or

(3) violated an ordinance of a municipal corporation;

the clerk shall collect a law enforcement continuing education program fee of four dollars ($4).

[Pre-2004 Recodification Citation: 33-19-6-7.]

As added by P.L.98-2004, SEC.16. Amended by P.L.97-2008, SEC.6; P.L.187-2015, SEC.37.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2017–2024 · leading case: Matthew Williams v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matthew Williams v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “” Indiana Code Section 33-37-5-8 provides for an alcohol and drug services program fee “set by the court under IC 12-23-14-16.”
Tailar Spells v. State of Indiana (Ind. 2024). · cites it 2× “§ 33- 37-4-1(b)(4) (2023); I.C. § 33-37-5-8(c) (2015). However, the $2 jury fee authorized by code section 33-37-5-19 is not part of the “costs” for which a convicted defendant is liable, because it is not prescribed by code section 9We note that code section 33-37-1-3(b) states…”
Ind. Code § 33-37-5-8(c): 1 case
Tailar Spells v. State of Indiana (Ind. 2024). “§ 33- 37-4-1(b)(4) (2023); I.C. § 33-37-5-8(c) (2015). However, the $2 jury fee authorized by code section 33-37-5-19 is not part of the “costs” for which a convicted defendant is liable, because it is not prescribed by code section 9We note that code section 33-37-1-3(b) states…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.