Sec. 12. Upon application of a party, but not before
ninety (90) days after the mailing of a copy of the award to the parties,
the court shall confirm an award, unless within the time limits
hereinafter imposed grounds are urged for vacating or modifying or
correcting the award, in which case the court shall proceed as provided
in sections 13 and 14 of this chapter. Upon confirmation, the court shall
enter a judgment consistent with the award and cause such entry to be
docketed as if rendered in an action in the court.
[Pre-1998 Recodification Citation: 34-4-2-12.]
As added by P.L.1-1998, SEC.53.
Notes of Decisions
MBNA Am. Bank, N.A. v. Rogers, 835 N.E.2d 219 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 4× “Ind.Code § 34-57-2-12. Concerning confirmations and objections to awards, the FAA and the Indiana Act follow the same general scheme although the FAA sets the limitation period [for objections] at three months rather than ninety days as provided in the Indiana Act.”
Nat'l Wine & Spirits, Inc., Nat'l Wine & Spirits Corp., NWS, Inc., NWS Michigan, Inc., & NWS, LLC v. Ernst & Young, LLP, 976 N.E.2d 699 (Ind. 2012).
· cites it 2× “Indiana Code section 34-57-2-12 states in full, Upon application of a party, but not before ninety (90) days after the mailing of a copy of the award to the parties, the court shall confirm an award, unless within the time limits hereinafter imposed grounds are urged for…”
Groves v. Groves, 704 N.E.2d 1072 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 2× “Ind.Code §§ 34-57-2-12 to -14. Whether or not a pending application with the arbitrator to reconsider the award under Section 10 tolls these time limits is a question which has not yet been addressed by Indiana courts.”
Mark Baker v. Adam Pickering (Ind. Ct. App. 2024).
· cites it 4× “Baker Invited Any Error in the Trial Court’s Confirmation of the Arbitration Award [16] Indiana Code Section 34-57-2-12 provides: Upon application of a party, but not before ninety (90) days after the mailing of a copy of the award to the parties, the court shall confirm an…”
Delta Bldg. Grp., Inc. v. Laurenzano, 879 N.E.2d 592 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 6× “Ind.Code § 34-57-2-12 (emphasis added). Delta notes that we did not restate the second sentence of the statute in our original opinion and therefore presumes that we did not consider the entire statute in rendering our decision.”
Wagner v. Brokers Int'l Fin. Servs., LLC (S.D. Ind. 2022).
· cites it 2× “The petition was based solely on Indiana law—the Indiana Uniform Arbitration Act, Ind. Code § 34-57-2-12 . Id. Mr. Perry and Brokers removed the case to this Court, alleging federal-question jurisdiction under 28 U.”
Delta Bldg. Grp., Inc. v. Laurenzano, 873 N.E.2d 1132 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 2× “Code Section 34-57-2-12 (“Upon application of a party, but not before ninety (90) days after *1137 the mailing of a copy of the award to the parties, the court shall confirm an award, unless within the time limits hereinafter imposed grounds are urged for vacating or modifying…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.