Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 34-7-7-2 (2026)

"Act in furtherance of a person's right of petition or free speech under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Indiana in connection with a public issue" defined

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 2. As used in this chapter, "act in furtherance of a person's right of petition or free speech under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Indiana in connection with a public issue" includes any conduct in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of:

(1) petition; or

(2) free speech;

in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest.

As added by P.L.114-1998, SEC.7.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 2012–2018 · leading case: Paul Gresk, Tr. for the Bankr. Est. of Derek VanWinkle & Stacey VanWinkle on behalf of M v. & A v. their minor Child. v. Cortney Demetris, M.D., 81 N.E.3d 645 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Paul Gresk, Tr. for the Bankr. Est. of Derek VanWinkle & Stacey VanWinkle on behalf of M v. & A v. their minor Child. v. Cortney Demetris, M.D., 81 N.E.3d 645 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 4× “” Ind. Code § 34-7-7-2 . 9 . Discovery not relevant to the motion to dismiss is stayed upon the filing of the motion.”

Warren Whisenhunt v. Matthew Lippincott & Creg Parks, 416 S.W.3d 689 (Tex. App. 2013). “Ind.Code § 34-7-7-2. 18 . Or.Rev.Stat. § 31.”

Pierson v. Nat'l Inst. for Labor Relations Rsch., 319 F. Supp. 3d 1100 (N.D. Ind. 2018). “Indiana Anti-SLAPP Statute Defendants seek attorney's fees pursuant to Indiana code § 34-7-7-2 et seq. , commonly known also as the State's anti-SLAPP law, or law against Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation.”

Kathleen G. Babchuk v. Kirk J. Daniels (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “4 As set forth in Indiana Code § 34-7-7-2, the phrase “act in furtherance of a person’s right of petition or free speech under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Indiana in connection with a public issue” is defined to include “any conduct…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.