Ind. Code » Title 35
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 35-35-3-1 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.4. Amended by Acts 1982, P.L.204, SEC.27; P.L.320-1983, SEC.18; P.L.71-2005, SEC.1. Repealed by P.L.114-2012, SEC.74.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1991–2007 · leading case: Badger v. State, 637 N.E.2d 800 (Ind. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Badger v. State, 637 N.E.2d 800 (Ind. 1994). · cites it 8× “" Ind. Code § 35-35-3-1 (1993). As part of the plea agreement, the prosecuting attorney may include a recommendation.”
Shane v. State, 716 N.E.2d 391 (Ind. 1999). · cites it 4× “" Ind. Code § 35-35-3-1 (1998). A plea is "contractual in nature, binding the defendant, the state and the trial court.”
Robertson v. State, 871 N.E.2d 280 (Ind. 2007). · cites it 2× “71-2005, §§ 1, 3, 4, 6-10 (codified as Ind.Code §§ 35-35-3-1, -38-1-7.1, -50-1-2, 50-2-3 to -7 (Supp.”
Hampton v. State, 873 N.E.2d 1074 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “Ind.Code §§ 35-35-3-1, -38-1-7.1, -50-1-2, 50-2-3 to -7.”
Weatherford v. State, 697 N.E.2d 32 (Ind. 1998). · cites it 2× “” Ind.Code Ann. § 35-35-3-1 (West 1998). Weatherford may, however, appeal the trial court’s ruling on his motion to withdraw.”
Bezy v. Loftus, 581 N.E.2d 965 (Ind. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “" Ind. Code § 35-35-3-1 . [2] The court referred to the agreement as a pre-trial diversion agreement.”
Schweitzer v. State, 700 N.E.2d 488 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “CODE § 35-35-3-1) of the crime for which the defendant is serving the sentence.”
Johnston v. State, 702 N.E.2d 1085 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “CODE § 35-35-3-1 through § 35-35-3-7 and any relevant sentencing provisions.”
Webster v. State, 708 N.E.2d 610 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). “CODE § 35-35-3-1. At the guilty plea hearing, the trial court asked Webster to summarize the events that purportedly took place in the early afternoon of July 29, 1997.”
Hampton v. State, 873 N.E.2d 1083 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “Ind.Code §§ 35-35-3-1, -38-1-7.1, -50-1-2, 50-2-3 to -7.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.