Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 35-41-1-24.7 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As added by P.L.296-1987, SEC.4. Amended by P.L.34-1991, SEC.27; P.L.9-1991, SEC.95; P.L.2-1992, SEC.880; P.L.81-1992, SEC.38; P.L.1-1993, SEC.240; P.L.160-1994, SEC.1; P.L.1-2005, SEC.227; P.L.145-2006, SEC.370. Repealed by P.L.114-2012, SEC.127.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1995–2012 · leading case: French v. State, 778 N.E.2d 816 (Ind. 2002).
French v. State, 778 N.E.2d 816 (Ind. 2002). · cites it 4× “Section 35-41-1-24.7 provides, in relevant part, that the term "school property" includes "a building or other structure owned or rented by .”
Whitt v. State, 645 N.E.2d 677 (Ind. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 4× “I.C. § 35-41-1-24.7(1). [5] We cannot reduce the conviction to the lesser included offense of possession because the language of the information almost exactly tracks the statutory language of the greater offense.”
Dixon v. State, 712 N.E.2d 1086 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “" In proving that Dixon's transaction with Turner occurred within 1,000 feet of a school, the State elicited testimony from an associate superintendent for the Richmond Community Schools. He testified that the property was owned by the school corporation, and that the school…”
Whitt v. State, 659 N.E.2d 512 (Ind. 1995). · cites it 2× “Conclusion We vacate the decision of the Court of Appeals with respect to Whitt's conviction for possession of cocaine within one thousand feet of a school.”
Haley v. State, 736 N.E.2d 1250 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “Further, Haley argues that absent the judicial notice, there was insufficient evidence to prove that Howe is a school for purposes of Indiana Code § 35-41-1-24.7. We address both arguments in turn.”
Seeley v. State, 936 N.E.2d 863 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “Gabriel's was "school property" under Indiana Code Section 35-41-1-24.7. When reviewing a claim challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, we do not reweigh the evidence or judge the credibility of the witnesses.”
Robert A. Baker v. State of Indiana, 967 N.E.2d 1037 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 4× “Ind.Code § 35-41-1-24.7 (Supp.2006) provides: "School property" means the following: (1) A building or other structure owned or rented by: (A) a school corporation; (B) an entity that is required to be licensed under IC 12-17.”
Ind. Code § 35-41-1-24.7(1): 1 case
Whitt v. State, 645 N.E.2d 677 (Ind. Ct. App. 1995). “I.C. § 35-41-1-24.7(1). [5] We cannot reduce the conviction to the lesser included offense of possession because the language of the information almost exactly tracks the statutory language of the greater offense.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.