Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 35-41-1-26.3 (2026)
Repealed
✓ current as of May 2026
As added by P.L.138-2011, SEC.10; P.L.182-2011, SEC.10. Repealed by P.L.114-2012, SEC.131; P.L.114-2012, SEC.151.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2012–2015 · leading case: Gary Elvers v. State of Indiana, 22 N.E.3d 824 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014).
Gary Elvers v. State of Indiana, 22 N.E.3d 824 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). “I.C. § 35-41-1-26.3. 2 Four days later, Detective Nielson attempted to make a third undercover pur *829 chase of spice and bath salts from Elvie’s.”
A.M. v. State of Indiana, 981 N.E.2d 91 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). “On March 15, 2012, schedule I was reworked to include "synthetic drugs,” which were defined at Indiana Code 35-41-1-26.3 and included all of the formerly defined synthetic cannabinoid substances as well as numerous other chemical compounds.”
Ashfaque v. State, 25 N.E.3d 183 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015). “To further confuse matters, the State cited Ind.Code § 35-41-1-26.3 as the source for the definition of "synthetic drug.”
Joey Saylor v. State of Indiana (Ind. Ct. App. 2013). “5 Public Law 78-2012, section 11 , amended Indiana Code 35-41-1-26.3 (now Indiana Code section 35-31.”
Ind. Code § 35-41-1-26.3(1)(B): 1 case
Joey Saylor v. State of Indiana (Ind. Ct. App. 2013). “5 Public Law 78-2012, section 11 , amended Indiana Code 35-41-1-26.3 (now Indiana Code section 35-31.”
Ind. Code § 35-41-1-26.3(6): 1 case
Gary Elvers v. State of Indiana, 22 N.E.3d 824 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). “I.C. § 35-41-1-26.3. 2 Four days later, Detective Nielson attempted to make a third undercover pur *829 chase of spice and bath salts from Elvie’s.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.