Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 35-42-2-6 (2026)
Repealed
✓ current as of May 2026
As added by P.L.298-1995, SEC.1. Amended by P.L.88-2002, SEC.1; P.L.85-2004, SEC.53; P.L.178-2007, SEC.3; P.L.131-2009, SEC.74; P.L.77-2012, SEC.62. Repealed by P.L.158-2013, SEC.429.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1997–2014 · leading case: Nash v. State, 881 N.E.2d 1060 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
Nash v. State, 881 N.E.2d 1060 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). “Indiana Code Section 35-42-2-6(a) defines a “corrections officer” to include persons employed by (1) the department of correction; *1063 (2) a law enforcement agency; (3) a probation department; (4) a county jail; or (5) a circuit, superior, county, probate, city, or town court.”
Henson v. State, 786 N.E.2d 274 (Ind. 2003). “See Ind.Code § 35-42-2-6(c) ("A person who knowingly or intentionally in a rude, insolent, or angry manner places blood or another body fluid or waste on a law enforcement officer or corrections officer identified as such and while engaged in the performance of official duties .”
Warr v. State, 877 N.E.2d 817 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). “See Ind.Code § 35-42-2-6(c) (2004). Warr also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the trial court’s findings that she was in direct criminal contempt of court.”
Haggard v. State, 771 N.E.2d 668 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). “See Ind.Code § 35-42-2-6 (1998). 3 . See Ind.”
Thomas v. State, 749 N.E.2d 1231 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001). “1 He raises two issues on appeal: first, whether the trial court erred by admitting hearsay testimony of one deputy who testified that another deputy said Thomas spit on him, and second, whether the legislature intended Ind.Code § 35-42-2-6 to apply to situations where no…”
Henson v. State, 798 N.E.2d 540 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). “Ind.Code § 35-42-2-6. 2 . Zeabart was, at that time, a correctional officer at Wabash Valley.”
Baker v. State, 768 N.E.2d 477 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). “Ind.Code § 35-42-2-6 (Burns Code Ed. Repl.”
Newman v. State, 677 N.E.2d 590 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997). “Ind.Code 35-42-2-6(c). 2 . Ind.Code 35-45-4-2.”
Jerry D. Boyce v. State of Indiana, No. 16A01-1210-CR-453 (Ind. Ct. App. Apr. 30, 2013). “ISSUE Boyce raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as: Whether the State presented sufficient evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Boyce had the requisite mens rea to commit the charges.”
Matthew D. Tribble v. State of Indiana, No. 79A02-1404-CR-290 (Ind. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2014). “) 2 I.C. § 35-42-2-6. This statute is now repealed and Indiana Code Section 35-42-2-1(b)(2) describes battery by means of placing any bodily fluid or waste on another person.”
Kevin J. Mamon v. State of Indiana, No. 30A05-1309-CR-440 (Ind. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2014). “1 Ind. Code § 35-42-2-6 (c). 2 Sometime during the evening of November 20, 2012, an inmate worker reported that Mamon spit on him.”
George Small v. State of Indiana, No. 49A05-1304-CR-179 (Ind. Ct. App. Oct. 31, 2013). “identified as such and while engaged in the performance of official duties .”
Ind. Code § 35-42-2-6(a): 1 case
Nash v. State, 881 N.E.2d 1060 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). “Indiana Code Section 35-42-2-6(a) defines a “corrections officer” to include persons employed by (1) the department of correction; *1063 (2) a law enforcement agency; (3) a probation department; (4) a county jail; or (5) a circuit, superior, county, probate, city, or town court.”
Ind. Code § 35-42-2-6(c): 3 cases
Henson v. State, 786 N.E.2d 274 (Ind. 2003). “See Ind.Code § 35-42-2-6(c) ("A person who knowingly or intentionally in a rude, insolent, or angry manner places blood or another body fluid or waste on a law enforcement officer or corrections officer identified as such and while engaged in the performance of official duties .”
Warr v. State, 877 N.E.2d 817 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). “See Ind.Code § 35-42-2-6(c) (2004). Warr also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the trial court’s findings that she was in direct criminal contempt of court.”
Newman v. State, 677 N.E.2d 590 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997). “Ind.Code 35-42-2-6(c). 2 . Ind.Code 35-45-4-2.”
Ind. Code § 35-42-2-6(e): 2 cases
Nash v. State, 881 N.E.2d 1060 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). “Indiana Code Section 35-42-2-6(a) defines a “corrections officer” to include persons employed by (1) the department of correction; *1063 (2) a law enforcement agency; (3) a probation department; (4) a county jail; or (5) a circuit, superior, county, probate, city, or town court.”
Jerry D. Boyce v. State of Indiana, No. 16A01-1210-CR-453 (Ind. Ct. App. Apr. 30, 2013). “ISSUE Boyce raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as: Whether the State presented sufficient evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Boyce had the requisite mens rea to commit the charges.”
Ind. Code § 35-42-2-6(e)(l): 1 case
Nash v. State, 881 N.E.2d 1060 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). “Indiana Code Section 35-42-2-6(a) defines a “corrections officer” to include persons employed by (1) the department of correction; *1063 (2) a law enforcement agency; (3) a probation department; (4) a county jail; or (5) a circuit, superior, county, probate, city, or town court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.