Sec. 1. (a) A person who communicates a threat with
the intent:
(1) that another person engage in conduct against the other
person's will;
(2) that another person be placed in fear of retaliation for a prior
lawful act;
(3) of:
(A) causing:
(i) a dwelling, a building, or other structure; or
(ii) a vehicle;
to be evacuated; or
(B) interfering with the occupancy of:
(i) a dwelling, building, or other structure; or
(ii) a vehicle; or
(4) that another person be placed in fear that the threat will be
carried out, if the threat is a threat described in:
(A) subsection (c)(1) through (c)(5); or
(B) subsection (c)(7) through (c)(8);
commits intimidation, a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) However, the offense is a:
(1) Level 6 felony if:
(A) the threat is to commit a forcible felony;
(B) the subject of the threat or the person to whom the threat is
communicated is a witness (or the spouse or child of a witness)
in any pending criminal proceeding against the person making
the threat;
(C) the threat is communicated because of the occupation,
profession, employment status, or ownership status of a person
or the threat relates to or is made in connection with the
occupation, profession, employment status, or ownership status
of a person;
(D) the person has a prior unrelated conviction for an offense
under this section concerning the same victim; or
(E) the threat is communicated using property, including
electronic equipment or systems, of a school corporation or
other governmental entity; and
(2) Level 5 felony if:
(A) while committing it, the person draws or uses a deadly
weapon;
(B) the subject of the threat or the person to whom the threat is
communicated:
(i) is a judicial officer or bailiff of any court; or
(ii) is a prosecuting attorney or a deputy prosecuting attorney;
and the threat relates to the person's status as a judicial officer,
bailiff, prosecuting attorney, or deputy prosecuting attorney, or
is made in connection with the official duties of the judicial
officer, bailiff, prosecuting attorney, or deputy prosecuting
attorney; or
(C) the threat is:
(i) to commit terrorism; or
(ii) made in furtherance of an act of terrorism.
(c) "Threat" means an expression, by words or action, of an
intention to:
(1) unlawfully injure the person threatened or another person, or
damage property;
(2) unlawfully subject a person to physical confinement or
restraint;
(3) commit a crime;
(4) unlawfully withhold official action, or cause such withholding;
(5) unlawfully withhold testimony or information with respect to
another person's legal claim or defense, except for a reasonable
claim for witness fees or expenses;
(6) expose the person threatened to hatred, contempt, disgrace, or
ridicule;
(7) falsely harm the credit or business reputation of a person; or
(8) cause the evacuation of a dwelling, a building, another
structure, or a vehicle. For purposes of this subdivision, the term
includes an expression that would cause a reasonable person to
consider the evacuation of a dwelling, a building, another
structure, or a vehicle, even if the dwelling, building, structure, or
vehicle is not evacuated.
As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.5. Amended by Acts
1977, P.L.340, SEC.71; Acts 1981, P.L.300, SEC.3; P.L.183-1984,
SEC.6; P.L.325-1985, SEC.1; P.L.242-1993, SEC.3; P.L.164-1993,
SEC.12; P.L.1-1994, SEC.169; P.L.241-2001, SEC.3; P.L.175-2003,
SEC.3; P.L.3-2006, SEC.2; P.L.123-2013, SEC.3; P.L.158-2013,
SEC.523; P.L.168-2014, SEC.82; P.L.85-2017, SEC.114; P.L.66-2019,
SEC.17; P.L.5-2022, SEC.6.
Notes of Decisions
Daniel Brewington v. State of Indiana, 7 N.E.3d 946 (Ind. 2014).
· cites it 14× “Enforceability of the Intimidation Statute Generally As the discussion above illustrates, the “actual malice” standard is so steep that prosecutions involving public figures or issues of public concern under Indiana Code section 35-45-2-1 (c)(6) or (7) are all but impossible.”
Eberle v. State, 942 N.E.2d 848 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 16× “NOTES [1] Ind.Code § 35-45-2-1. [2] I.C. § 35-45-2-2.”
E.B. v. State of Indiana, 89 N.E.3d 1087 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 10× “Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1 . The statute further defines a "threat" as: An expression, by words or action, of an intention to: (1) unlawfully injure the person threatened or another person, or damage property; (2) unlawfully subject a person to physical confinement or restraint; (3)…”
Casey v. State, 676 N.E.2d 1069 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997).
· cites it 10× “I.C. § 35-45-2-1; Hendrix v. State, 615 N.”
Montgomery v. State, 878 N.E.2d 262 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 8× “Indiana Code § 35-45-2-1 provides, in pertinent part: *266 (a) A person who communicates a threat to another person, with the intent: * * ¾: ⅜ # ,⅝ (2) that the other person be placed in fear of retaliation for a prior lawful act .”
Leonard Blackmon v. State of Indiana, 32 N.E.3d 1178 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 18× “He then asked who had given 1 Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1 . Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 71A03-1411-CR-413 | May 22, 2015 Page 2 of 19 them permission to use the water.”
United States v. Ellis, Bernard, 622 F.3d 784 (7th Cir. 2010).
· cites it 5× “Their disagreement centers on whether his Indiana conviction for felony intimidation under Ind.Code § 35-45-2-1 qualifies as a third violent felony.”
Rakiea McCaskill v. State of Indiana, 3 N.E.3d 1047 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 8× “Pursuant to Indiana Code § 35-45-2-1(a), a person commits intimidation if that person "communicates a threat to another person, with the intent: (1) that the other person engage in conduct against the other person's will; [or] (2) that the other person be placed in fear of…”
McIntire v. State, 717 N.E.2d 96 (Ind. 1999).
· cites it 6× “CODE § 35-45-2-1 (1993 & Supp.1996). Each of these statutory provisions requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.”
Roar v. State, 52 N.E.3d 940 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 4× “” Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1 (2013). A reasonable fact-finder could conclude that the State presented sufficient evidence to support its charge of intimidation.”
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(2): 1 case
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(a): 28 cases
Rakiea McCaskill v. State of Indiana, 3 N.E.3d 1047 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014).
“Pursuant to Indiana Code § 35-45-2-1(a), a person commits intimidation if that person "communicates a threat to another person, with the intent: (1) that the other person engage in conduct against the other person's will; [or] (2) that the other person be placed in fear of…”
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(a)(1): 25 cases
Rakiea McCaskill v. State of Indiana, 3 N.E.3d 1047 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014).
“Pursuant to Indiana Code § 35-45-2-1(a), a person commits intimidation if that person "communicates a threat to another person, with the intent: (1) that the other person engage in conduct against the other person's will; [or] (2) that the other person be placed in fear of…”
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(a)(1)(b)(1): 1 case
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(a)(2): 33 cases
United States v. Ellis, Bernard, 622 F.3d 784 (7th Cir. 2010).
“Their disagreement centers on whether his Indiana conviction for felony intimidation under Ind.Code § 35-45-2-1 qualifies as a third violent felony.”
Leonard Blackmon v. State of Indiana, 32 N.E.3d 1178 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015).
“He then asked who had given 1 Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1 . Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 71A03-1411-CR-413 | May 22, 2015 Page 2 of 19 them permission to use the water.”
Eberle v. State, 942 N.E.2d 848 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011).
“NOTES [1] Ind.Code § 35-45-2-1. [2] I.C. § 35-45-2-2.”
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(a)(3): 1 case
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(a)(4): 5 cases
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(b): 7 cases
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(b)(1): 6 cases
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(b)(1)(A): 6 cases
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(b)(1)(B): 1 case
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(b)(1)(B)(i): 4 cases
Eberle v. State, 942 N.E.2d 848 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011).
“NOTES [1] Ind.Code § 35-45-2-1. [2] I.C. § 35-45-2-2.”
United States v. Ellis, Bernard, 622 F.3d 784 (7th Cir. 2010).
“Their disagreement centers on whether his Indiana conviction for felony intimidation under Ind.Code § 35-45-2-1 qualifies as a third violent felony.”
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(b)(1)(B)(ii): 1 case
Daniel Brewington v. State of Indiana, 7 N.E.3d 946 (Ind. 2014).
“Enforceability of the Intimidation Statute Generally As the discussion above illustrates, the “actual malice” standard is so steep that prosecutions involving public figures or issues of public concern under Indiana Code section 35-45-2-1 (c)(6) or (7) are all but impossible.”
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(b)(1)(C): 1 case
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(b)(2): 7 cases
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(b)(2)(A): 3 cases
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(c): 11 cases
Daniel Brewington v. State of Indiana, 7 N.E.3d 946 (Ind. 2014).
“Enforceability of the Intimidation Statute Generally As the discussion above illustrates, the “actual malice” standard is so steep that prosecutions involving public figures or issues of public concern under Indiana Code section 35-45-2-1 (c)(6) or (7) are all but impossible.”
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(c)(1): 8 cases
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(c)(3): 1 case
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(c)(6): 2 cases
Daniel Brewington v. State of Indiana, 7 N.E.3d 946 (Ind. 2014).
“Enforceability of the Intimidation Statute Generally As the discussion above illustrates, the “actual malice” standard is so steep that prosecutions involving public figures or issues of public concern under Indiana Code section 35-45-2-1 (c)(6) or (7) are all but impossible.”
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(c)(7): 1 case
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(d): 7 cases
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(d)(1): 4 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.