Sec. 1. (a) As used in this section, "human organ"
means the kidney, liver, heart, lung, cornea, eye, bone marrow, bone,
pancreas, or skin of a human body.
(b) As used in this section, "item of value" means money, real
estate, funeral related services, and personal property. "Item of value"
does not include:
(1) the reasonable payments associated with the removal,
transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality
control, and storage of a human organ; or
(2) the reimbursement of travel, housing, lost wages, and other
expenses incurred by the donor of a human organ related to the
donation of the human organ.
(c) A person who intentionally acquires, receives, sells, or transfers,
in exchange for an item of value, a human organ for use in human
organ transplantation commits unlawful transfer of human organs, a
Level 5 felony.
As added by P.L.131-1992, SEC.2. Amended by P.L.217-1997,
SEC.1; P.L.158-2013, SEC.570; P.L.213-2016, SEC.29.
Notes of Decisions
Trs. of Indiana Univ. v. Terry Curry, 918 F.3d 537 (7th Cir. 2019).
· cites it 5× “" Ind. Code § 35-46-5-1 .5(d). A federal district court held that several terms in this statute are unconstitutionally vague and that it must be treated as if it read: "A person who intentionally sells fetal tissue commits unlawful transfer of fetal tissue, a Level 5 felony.”
Bolin v. Wingert, 764 N.E.2d 201 (Ind. 2002).
· cites it 3× “at § 35-46-5-1(a). 12 . Count II of the complaint seeks compensation for Calvin Bolin's loss of consortium with his wife.”
Trs. of Ind. Univ. v. Prosecutor of Marion Cnty. Ind., 289 F. Supp. 3d 905 (S.D. Ind. 2018).
· cites it 32× “" Ind. Code § 35-46-5-1 .5. That section, in its entirety, reads as follows: (a) As used in this section, 'aborted' means the termination of human pregnancy with an intention other than to produce a live birth or to remove a dead fetus.”
Ind. Code § 35-46-5-1(a): 2 cases
Bolin v. Wingert, 764 N.E.2d 201 (Ind. 2002).
“at § 35-46-5-1(a). 12 . Count II of the complaint seeks compensation for Calvin Bolin's loss of consortium with his wife.”
Ind. Code § 35-46-5-1(d): 2 cases
Bolin v. Wingert, 764 N.E.2d 201 (Ind. 2002).
“at § 35-46-5-1(a). 12 . Count II of the complaint seeks compensation for Calvin Bolin's loss of consortium with his wife.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.