Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 35-48-2-2 (2026)
Nomenclature
✓ current as of May 2026
Sec. 2. Nomenclature. The controlled substances listed in the schedules in sections 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 of this chapter are included by whatever official, common, usual, chemical, or trade name designated. The number placed in brackets after each substance is its federal Drug Enforcement Administration Controlled Substances Code Number which is to be used for identification purposes on certain certificates of registration.
As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.7. Amended by Acts 1979, P.L.303, SEC.2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1983–2011 · leading case: Wright v. State, 658 N.E.2d 563 (Ind. 1995).
Wright v. State, 658 N.E.2d 563 (Ind. 1995). “The Jones court concluded that the State had not, by the way it drafted the information, foreclosed an instruction on Criminal Trespass: "Although eriminal trespass is not an inherently included offense of burglary," compare now Ind.Code Ann. § 35-48-2-2(a)(4) (West Supp.”
Jones v. State, 456 N.E.2d 1025 (Ind. 1983). “After holding that criminal trespass under Ind.Code § 35-48-2-2(a) (Burns 1979 Repl.”
Malott v. State, 485 N.E.2d 879 (Ind. 1985). “), and two additional burglary counts, class C felonies, Ind.Code § 35-48-2-2 (Burns 1985 Repl). Defendant-appellant Malott received an aggregate prison term of fifty years: a fifty-year sentence for the class A burglary to be served concurrently with a fifty year sentence…”
A.E.B. v. State, 756 N.E.2d 536 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001). “I.C. § 35-48-2-2(a). A.E.B. insists that she could not have committed criminal trespass because as a student at Coleman Middle School she had a contractual interest in the property.”
Blakney v. State, 819 N.E.2d 542 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). “Ind.Code § 35-48-2-2(a)(1). A person has been "denied entry" under subsection (a)(1) when the person has been denied entry by means of "posting or exhibiting a notice at the main entrance in a manner that is either prescribed by law or likely to come to the attention of the…”
Olsen v. State, 663 N.E.2d 1194 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996). “§ 35-48-2-2. Three witnesses, including Olsen himself, testified that Olsen was asked to leave the lobby but that he had refused to do so.”
Alves v. State, 816 N.E.2d 64 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). “Ind.Code § 35-48-2-2 provides a person may be "denied entry" for trespass purposes by means of "posting or exhibiting a notice at the main entrance in a manner that is either prescribed by law or likely to come to the attention of the public.”
Lyles v. State, 956 N.E.2d 180 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011). “See Ind.Code § 35-48-2-2. In addition, the State had to prove that Lyles did not have a contractual interest in the property.”
Travis v. State, 812 N.E.2d 826 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). “If this case had involved a private property owner who had told Travis to leave his property and Travis had returned two days later, we would agree with the State that all the elements of criminal trespass under Indiana Code Section 35-48-2-2(a)(1) would be met. While a private…”
McKean v. State, 500 N.E.2d 1184 (Ind. 1986). “Further, we held that Ind.Code § 35-48-2-2 (Burns 1979) limits the purpose of the DEA number placed in brackets after the word "cocaine" in Schedule II, and does not refer to a material element of the crime.”
Massengill v. Indiana Nat'l Bank, 550 N.E.2d 97 (Ind. Ct. App. 1990). “Repossession upon default is not, in and of itself, a criminal trespass under Ind.Code 35-48-2-2(4). Consent for the repossession of the chattel by the defaulting party is not necessary.”
Ind. Code § 35-48-2-2(4): 1 case
Massengill v. Indiana Nat'l Bank, 550 N.E.2d 97 (Ind. Ct. App. 1990). “Repossession upon default is not, in and of itself, a criminal trespass under Ind.Code 35-48-2-2(4). Consent for the repossession of the chattel by the defaulting party is not necessary.”
Ind. Code § 35-48-2-2(a): 2 cases
Jones v. State, 456 N.E.2d 1025 (Ind. 1983). “After holding that criminal trespass under Ind.Code § 35-48-2-2(a) (Burns 1979 Repl.”
A.E.B. v. State, 756 N.E.2d 536 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001). “I.C. § 35-48-2-2(a). A.E.B. insists that she could not have committed criminal trespass because as a student at Coleman Middle School she had a contractual interest in the property.”
Ind. Code § 35-48-2-2(a)(1): 2 cases
Travis v. State, 812 N.E.2d 826 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). “If this case had involved a private property owner who had told Travis to leave his property and Travis had returned two days later, we would agree with the State that all the elements of criminal trespass under Indiana Code Section 35-48-2-2(a)(1) would be met. While a private…”
Blakney v. State, 819 N.E.2d 542 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). “Ind.Code § 35-48-2-2(a)(1). A person has been "denied entry" under subsection (a)(1) when the person has been denied entry by means of "posting or exhibiting a notice at the main entrance in a manner that is either prescribed by law or likely to come to the attention of the…”
Ind. Code § 35-48-2-2(a)(4): 1 case
Wright v. State, 658 N.E.2d 563 (Ind. 1995). “The Jones court concluded that the State had not, by the way it drafted the information, foreclosed an instruction on Criminal Trespass: "Although eriminal trespass is not an inherently included offense of burglary," compare now Ind.Code Ann. § 35-48-2-2(a)(4) (West Supp.”
Ind. Code § 35-48-2-2(a)(5): 1 case
Jones v. State, 456 N.E.2d 1025 (Ind. 1983). “After holding that criminal trespass under Ind.Code § 35-48-2-2(a) (Burns 1979 Repl.”
Ind. Code § 35-48-2-2(b): 1 case
Blakney v. State, 819 N.E.2d 542 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). “Ind.Code § 35-48-2-2(a)(1). A person has been "denied entry" under subsection (a)(1) when the person has been denied entry by means of "posting or exhibiting a notice at the main entrance in a manner that is either prescribed by law or likely to come to the attention of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.