Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 36-4-8-4 (2026)

Claims against city; audit; refusal to pay

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 4. (a) The city fiscal officer may audit a claim against the city by examining under oath any officer, agent, or employee of the city or any other person. When acting under this section, the fiscal officer has the same powers as the city legislative body in summoning and examining witnesses.

     (b) If the fiscal officer finds that:

(1) the claim includes an item for which no appropriation has been made;

(2) there is not a sufficient balance for payment of the claim in the proper fund; or

(3) the claim should not be approved for any reason;

the fiscal officer may not issue warrants to pay the claim and the fiscal officer shall notify the proper department of the reasons for the fiscal officer's refusal to pay the claim.

[Pre-Local Government Recodification Citation: 18-1-6-11 part.]

As added by Acts 1980, P.L.212, SEC.3. Amended by P.L.127-2017, SEC.132.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2002–2010 · leading case: Hancock Cnty. Rural Elec. Membership Corp. v. City of Greenfield, 768 N.E.2d 909 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002).
Hancock Cnty. Rural Elec. Membership Corp. v. City of Greenfield, 768 N.E.2d 909 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “Ind.Code § 36-4-8-4(a)(1). After the annexation ordinance is adopted and no remonstrance is filed, the ordinance takes effect at least sixty days after its publication and filing with the county recorder.”
Town of Dyer v. Town of St. John, 919 N.E.2d 1196 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “IC. § 36-4-8-4. None of these exceptions apply here.”
Ind. Code § 36-4-8-4(a)(1): 1 case
Hancock Cnty. Rural Elec. Membership Corp. v. City of Greenfield, 768 N.E.2d 909 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). “Ind.Code § 36-4-8-4(a)(1). After the annexation ordinance is adopted and no remonstrance is filed, the ordinance takes effect at least sixty days after its publication and filing with the county recorder.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.