Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 4-33-1-1 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As added by P.L.277-1993(ss), SEC.124. Amended by P.L.92-2003, SEC.1; P.L.233-2007, SEC.11. Repealed by P.L.293-2019, SEC.3.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2009–2018 · leading case: Zoeller v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc., 904 N.E.2d 213 (Ind. 2009).
Zoeller v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc., 904 N.E.2d 213 (Ind. 2009). · cites it 2× “See Ind.Code § 4-33-1-1 et seq. Our General Assembly explicitly declared that one of the purposes behind allowing riverboat gambling was to foster economic development.”
City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc., 908 N.E.2d 611 (Ind. 2009). · cites it 2× “See Ind.Code § 4-33-1-1 et seq. (2008). Showboat entered into a local development agreement with East Chicago based on the recommendations of Mayor Robert Pastrick's Gaming Task Force.”
Switzerland Cnty. Assessor v. Belterra Resort Indiana, LLC, 101 N.E.3d 895 (Ind. T.C. 2018). · cites it 2× “Code § 4-33-2-17 (2009) ; Ind. Code § 4-33-1-1 (1), (2) (2009). By 2015, that definition had been amended several times to include casinos located in historic hotel districts, permanently moored craft, and real property adjacent to riverboat docking sites.”
In Re Majestic Star Casino, LLC, 457 B.R. 327 (Bankr. D. Del. 2011). “Ind.Code § 4-33-1-1 et seq. The Indiana Gaming Commission, the body charged with the licensing and regulation of riverboat gaming, subsequently issued eleven riverboat gaming licenses, the maximum number allowed under Indiana law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.